Surviving one extra bullet is much better than a faster sprint - if your entire squad could charge with you… yeah that would be a totally different story.
Also every nation has event swords - us veterans should have plenty by now.
1 Like
Sorry, I don’t understand your stupid question.
Imagine STG had historically accurate RPM of 500 - fake AK never would have been necessary.
Micro managing balance instead of mimicking reality is more effort and worse balance.
1 Like
He is asking that when you are for asymmetrical balance, that you should be against Soviets having jets and prototypes to mimic other nations gear.
4 Likes
Don’t worry, I can rephrase in simple English for you to understand:
If you like nation A have armor, nation B have sword, do you also like nation C have 1945 jet, but nation D not have 1946 jet?
You now understand? @Mortarion_Death
2 Likes
Why? Because it’s in your best interests to claim it in this particular thread.
But wait, as soon as we talk about running speed with a German machine gun, you’ll immediately change your mind. Right?
1 Like
I will keep reiterating this until it is understood:
Helmets do not protect against small arms fire, they are only meant to protect the wearer from falling debries and shrapnel kicked up by artillery (mortars included). This is not a thing in game, as the game does bot simulate falling stones, bricks or other junk kicked up by explosions, nor does the game simulate shrapnel travel (HE only effects things in its direct line of sight).
As the situations in which a helmet would help are not simulated in game, helmets should therefor do nothing.
Now yes, from certain angles, at certain ranges, and from certain calibers, a helmet could in theory deflect a shot. Now, the angles in this would even possibly even work be along the edges, but you know, if you weren’t wearing a helmet at all you wouldn’t have been hit on one of those locations, because the helmet makes your head bigger.
3 Likes
I’m for? Why do I think the question is stupid? Because he attributes certain statements to me and asks me to answer the outcome of this.
I’m happy with any balance.
2 Likes
I’m more than happy with the current situation. I like the swords and the cuirasses, the prototypes, and the planes from the future.
1 Like
So either you go and write a proposal to remove Japanese swords or get lost.
That’s not what I asked. You did not reply to my question:
Question:
Is it a Yes or a No?
I answered your question twice
No you have not answered whether you are in favor of symmetrical or asymmetrical balance.
You are only avoiding the answer because you know what the next question will be and you’re scared of it 
If you weren’t scared you’d just reply already: symmetrical or asymmetrical balance?
5 Likes
it seems simple
Professional avoiding of a simple question:
Why scared though?
5 Likes
ridiculously
I dont see you suggesting ratte?
Your arguments are invalid.
1 Like
10/10 avoiding the uncomfortable question.
Sitting on two chairs classic.
1 Like
