From Battlefield to cod, I’m extremely tired of this garbage mode. Invasion mode is more fun, more tactical, and doesn’t encourage players and sit at the edge of the map using snipers, which gives more kills and experience to everyone. Conquest is short, boring, and chaotic, full of snipers shooting from where u can see nothing.
6 Likes
completely the opposite of my opinion.
We need conquest to break up the monotony of invasion and assault.
I’ve never found these maps to be full of snipers, short or boring.
6 Likes
If you played only Domination in BF well your choice but there was a “invasion” mode, too.
I for my part would be happy about a bit more conquest in the Normandy campaign because I get maybe one round of Domination for two or three x invasion. additionally many US players would like to get more chances to be the defender and Axis players are aroused by the rare games where they are the defenders. The Moscow campaign seems to be a bit more mixed.
I also strongly oppose the idea of deleting conquest mode. I would even wish for a bit more conquest or at least changing sides in the Normandy camaign. Invasion only would tempt me to deinstall the game after one or two days invasion after invasion.
I think the only thing necessary is to make it possible to “opt out” from some modes on certain levels. I don’t know whether that is technically possible right now (e.g. if all servers run the same game type simultaneously then probably not). And if you opt out then only very rarely would you get into this game mode.
I like conquest mode on several maps, but not on some others and would be unhappy to get it removed.
And also if voice chat/team talk would work and we could coordinatedly attack “sniper nests” or alert for incoming assault / request help on a given location, that would make a difference.
eh it’s my least favorite mode too but it’s a standard inclusion for fps games for more relaxed play