Stop spouting nonsence, i don’t understand you
3 Likes
We’re back to square one. The KV-2 should stay at Tier 4. It has machine guns, armor protection, and the ability to ambush in dark areas. And you, you have no shame whatsoever!
1 Like
Playing dumb? Do you know that New Zealand console gamer? Last time I showed him what happens when you disrespect others.
I generally communicate amicably with people who like to reason, and confront those who act recklessly and unreasonably with a direct approach.
the KV2 should stay at tier 3 because that’s where it belongs, suggesting it’s equal to tiger and panther is just delusional
2 Likes
Friend, I think it’s easier to write a suggestion about this with a vote than to waste time on a troll.
3 Likes
yeah, good luck xd
No, it should be a Tier IV tank because it’s a heavy tank. Shouldn’t the Soviet superheroes have used KV-2 tanks to fight the superfascists? Saying the KV-2 is weak at Tier IV? You can’t say that when you’re cheating at Tier III
1 Like
Why does the autotranslator translate your nickname exactly THIS way?))
It sеems it knows something about you 
1 Like
That’s a good idea, Russian friend, but leaving comments on official event posts is more meaningful than voting separately.
Pack it in. If you want to argue take it to the PM system, don’t spam the News threads.
8 Likes
For event slots 4 and 7, can we get another ser of guns…1 each bringing the total to 4? Events that grind like this would be better to get more to at least try and outfit a squad. 2 rifles do not equal a tank.
The sIG33 has no armour. An HMG can take it out.
2 Likes
Will the Ferdinand be downteired to then? Fixed turrent, same speed, no MG and only 88mm?
Then that could drop tank destroyers like the Stugs down a level.
3 Likes
25k score sucks!!!
5 Likes
While technically the increase is higher on average for points than the 5k extra requirement it really doesn’t feel like anything changed to make it less of a grind.
1 Like
Comrades, perhaps the ISU-152 should be in BR IV instead of its current position in BR V, mainly due to the following considerations.
- Poor armor compared to enemy troops of the same level
- The DSHK machine gun needs to be used outside the vehicle body, risking one’s life
- As a self-propelled artillery, it is difficult to aim at targets outside the firing range when the tracks are destroyed
4.The loading speed of the 152mm artillery is subpar, especially when compared to its primary rival, the 88mm artillery - For the Soviet army, the ISU-152 at BR IV can be used to challenge enemy vehicles at BR V. For their enemies, the difficulty of destroying an ISU-152 with weapons at BR III is not significantly different from destroying a KV2.
Regardless, the ISU-152 vehicle itself remains an exquisite creation meticulously designed by its creators. I merely hope that the issues related to BR IV can be taken into consideration.
Hey, maybe I haven’t fully woken up. Why did I write two fours?
Idk.
But the ISU152 is already br IV…
1 Like
Actually, looking at my poll thread, 60% of the 60 voters agreed it should be BR 3. You’re absolutely right.
At BR 2, both German and Japanese tanks already have penetration ratings of over 90mm. Fighting this turretless tank is practically the same as fighting the KV-2. Its armour is only 75mm thick and completely vertical. Even so, plenty of players claim to oppose adjusting the KV-2 down to BR 3, ignoring clear facts to argue against the change.
It’s true its 12.7mm heavy machine gun deals high damage, yet its magazine capacity and total ammo stock are far too limited. The German MG42 roof-mounted machine gun works for both anti-air and anti-infantry use. Its fire rate, heat tolerance and ammo capacity are nearly double those of this Soviet heavy machine gun.
What’s more, this is a Victory Day event vehicle. If a regular tech tree vehicle had this performance, a higher BR rating would be reasonable. But event vehicles deserve looser balancing standards.
Take the Spitfire IX for example. Its performance belongs to the jet era, yet it stays at BR 2. The XA38 carries six 500-pound bombs and is BR 5 in the tech tree, but remains at BR 3 as an event aircraft.
In contrast, the Il-8 has a smaller bomb load than the XA38 and is placed at BR 4. It even uses wooden structural components for extra vulnerability.
German balance complaints follow a different pattern: their vehicles start at a well-suited BR and get increased simply due to player backlash. Soviet vehicles, however, launch with inherently mismatched battle ratings from the start.
This round of balancing is especially unreasonable. What will happen when the SU-152 releases later? Both vehicles share the exact same main cannon. Pushing this one to BR 4 just for an extra machine gun is absurd. If that logic holds, every German and American vehicle equipped with heavy machine guns would need their BR raised as well.
Some fool argued with me just now, questioning why a 1943 vehicle should fight against 1942 ones. All I can say is that he is being utterly double-standard. After all, the Allied side already has 1945-produced aircraft fighting against 1941-era fighters.