Alright, now drop the sturmpanzer back to where it was pls
5 Likes
Ahem, if my thread opens voting again, do you think it can stay at BR3? The number of votes in favor is really high. Please don’t close the poll for now.
Not a chance
It’s controversial anyways, majority of no’s on ru forum:3ий бр для ИСУ-152 - Боевой рейтинг - Enlisted — официальный форум
3 Likes
Wait majority for BR3 no votes? OR are they voting no for BR4?
What’s bad about that? It obviously wont cause any harm in BR4. Its really not complicated at all.
For example, Japan still does not have a grenade launcher for 3 BR.
1 Like
They literally do it’s arisaka mortar (the one i miss because i was gone for a while)
3 Likes
Oh, I see. Good grief, how did opinions end up splitting into two extreme sides? The votes I’ve collected are no fewer than the other side’s, and support for keeping it at BR3 on my thread is completely overwhelming.
It turns out users on the Russian forum aren’t fond of Soviet vehicles at all. What a real pity. Did they push the ISU-152 to BR4 all by themselves? That’s such a shame.
By the way, besides the ISU-152, my post also includes balancing suggestions for the IS-2 and German Panzer IV tanks. I hope you can take these proposals into consideration too. I believe the other suggestions are also practical, so please don’t close my thread.
It’s such a pity. I plan to extend the voting period to see if the poll results and public opinions change.
What does that have to do with ISU152?
At 4 br ISU will be facing Japan’s 3 br.
2 Likes
And Germany too.
I still haven’t found the entry to the Russian forum. Do you happen to know how to get in?
I have to say the Russian community is incredibly active with voting. They can easily gather over forty votes in no time. Even the BM-8-24 is poised to be moved to BR1.
Compared to theirs, our votes feel trivial and insignificant by comparison.
I need to promote my post more to rally everyone’s enthusiasm. Otherwise, we’ll never keep up with the Russian player base.
It would be funny if the ISU152 were the same br as the SIG.
Would be “perfectly balanced” as far as devs and staff think, eheheh.
(I wouldn’t be surprised if it happened)
5 Likes
The ISU-152 being well armed and useful on BR 5 is a bit of a stretch
Its good that you mentions it 15cm sIG 33 B Sfl sould be put to BR IV:
- Yes Move 15cm sIG 33 B Sfl to BR IV
- No im Axis Bias
0
voters
I voted yes for lol.
Fun fact, if the vehicle were Soviet it would definitely be br2. Or 1.
(If the SIG were Japanese they would probably put it in br5…) eheh
6 Likes
It was good at BR II I have no idea why they destroy everything fun … xD But now we can move it to BR IV so they can be happy.
3 Likes
It was funny in br2, yet not powerful because it exploded if a mild gust of wind hit it.
Apparently “it’s the reload speed”. That single dimension must not be overlooked! But all the problems it has can #becauseaxislostthewar.
Also clanners back then hated everything vehicle that could harm infantry and strived to make all of them useless.
Staff and devs are a “little (lot)” biased concerning br. Always been.
Marder? Too powerful! Br3! After a year finally 2. Mp40? Op! Br3! But pps42 br2… corrected after a while…
Ppsh41 equivalent? Beretta 20 rounds! Beretta is op as it’s precise!
… armours…
Etc etc etc.
I just find it extremely cringe.
For the record, ISU152 fits well in br4. It’s the staff & devs bias/double standards I find ridiculous.
That said, it’s just more of the same. Ok back to work 
5 Likes
