I think it should be BR2 though makes me wish we have rifle grenades that shoot smokes
1 Like
With the current matchmaking, one way or another you end up in BR2 XD.
1 Like
Man imagine rifles with smoke grenade launchers
Literally nothing for japan as always they are lacking really bad in the non Techtree department
3 Likes
5 grenades, like guerilla tnt, via special non-removable backpack, no secondary, only soldier that can equip launchers (3 grenades).
Perks similar to rifleman, base perk throw range x%
Very nice event , beyond maybe adding more event squad/aircraft for japan I have no complaints here.
One small addition to ask re soviet uniforms since its brought up here is a summer blanket/rolled coat uniform for Soviet soldiers if possible, since its featured in pic:
1 Like
Oh yes. Japan could also mount a small‑calibre gun, either 37 mm or 47 mm, it is hard to tell.
Event squad for noob tuber 
Its even a bit better :
Since it has better turn rate and this aircraft is more of a ground attacker however less ammo on the 37 mm cannon but more ammo in the MGs so yeah for a fighter slot definitely the P-39Q-5 is better if it was ground attacker slot maybe I would reverse them but P-39Q-5 is a better fighter.
it can even out-turn :
The Ki-61 at this point you are wondering how this aircrafts are BR IV since there is no one redeeming quality in them.
Same with the G-6 that is a bit better since it has a bit better climb however not really justifiable at BR IV its also more of a BR III plane. So this 3 aircrafts for sure must be turned to BR III aircrafts.
6 Likes
The Aircobra may turn tighter but it doesn’t look better than the Kawasaki Ki 61 Hein (Tony).
Funny to think that Kawasaki don’t just make mean sport bikes but they made a lot of planes and ships in WWII and they still do now + respect.
Sad thing for me is I can look at all these beautiful planes but I can’t fly with keyboard and mouse.
1 Like
True Kawasaki looks amazing however in war thunder is much much better plane then in Enlisted.
1 Like
Actually, I am wondering whether this aircraft could possibly be moved down to BR 2.
Looking at its ordnance and firepower, it feels inferior to the Type‑5 fighter on one hand, and inferior to the Spitfire Mk IX on the other.
No the MK IX is not a BR II aircraft xD
P-39 and P-63 are OK at BR III since at BR II combination of 250 kg bomb and 37 mm cannon will be a bit too deadly against ground vehicles I dont know is there is even a ground attacker with such capabilities.
1 Like
Well, the P‑40E and IAR already carry one 250 kg bomb plus two 50 kg bombs.
Their load‑outs are not overpowered at all.
I think the battle‑ratings for all aircraft could be lowered overall. This would enrich low‑tier gameplay and allow more planes to be added. The I‑185 only carries two 250 kg bombs, yet it sits at BR 5 alongside jet aircraft, which feels really frustrating. Even the Type‑5 fighter is only at BR 3.
I just hope that if DF adds the tank‑busting Stuka armed with two 37 mm cannons later, it will be placed at BR 2, instead of being thrown into BR 3 like the Il‑2‑37.
Japanese planes in war thunder man…
2 Likes
Well they are worse then P-63 They can go on a trade off but the P-63 is far better for your team to have the IAR is slower it worse turn time and climb same for P-40 it has better turn rate but its bugged. So simply P-40 has too big payload however its not the standard for a BR II aircraft and still will be worse then P-63 since you can do more things with the 37 mm cannon then the machine guns.
yeah nothing like here 