Reggiane Re.2005 Sagittario BR V

Suggestions Vehicles
1

The time it takes to give the BF 109 G-10/14 a 250kg bomb and improve the K-4 to make them worthy of the BR V is longer Quick order A fighter jet that actually has bombs.

The Reggiane Re.2005 Sagittario was born as the culmination of the Officine Meccaniche Reggiane fighter line Caproni group The goal was to create a fighter that could engage Allied aircraft from 1943-45 and at the same time function as a fighter-bomber with a real capacity to destroy medium and heavy armored vehicles

8470b22b7e484050699cc10646e38d76

Characteristics

•Maximum Speed: 620 km/h (with Italian Engine) - 650/720 km/h (with German Engine)

Fixed armament:3 x 20mm MG 151 cannons and 2 x 12.7mm Breda machine guns

Suspended armament: 1 Bomb of 500-650 KG in the ventral area And 2 bomb of 160 kg In the wing anchorages

Re.2005 serie 0 BR V 1x250 kg bomb and 2x160 kg A.P 160 bomb

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
6 Likes
2

Not to take off focus from this post, but on the topic of high BR Italian planes

SM 92

IMG_0226

Could carry two 500kg!

7 Likes
3

It’s another good option.

4

More Italian stuff, I like it

5

I like this.

6

I think maybe the Italian Engine version would maybe be BR4?

1 Like
7

Should be br 2 bcs LF mk IX spitfire is still br 2

8

This would have 1 500kg and 2 160kg… you’re overreacting.

Are you implying the spitfire should be BRIV+? BR3 at max!

1 Like
9

It’s wings are still broken and it still only has a 250lb bomb. Wwaaaaahhh, wwaaahh, whhhaaaaaaah

10

If i look at the top speed of that spitfire it should be most likely on a higher BR.

Event stuff is often on a lower BR.

11

SPIT LF SHOULD BE AT LEAST BR 4 since the DF release LF for a event reward

in WT, it’s one of best prop fighter in WT ARB and had same BR with 109 K-4 and even nerfed to 6.0 due to massive flight performance.
Even the Re 2005(not VDM type) which the topic of this suggestion
has no flight performance advantage with LF, really since of it has weaker engine(Early DB 605,with not MW50)

I think DF setting the BR focused too much on the bomb layout.
Focusing on flight performance attacker br isnt, but fighter BR is seriously unfair.

and… i dont think about they give 1 500kg and 2 160 kg bombs to 2005 thing… They didn’t even give the K-4 in WT its 500kg loadout, so why would this one be any different?

12

I cant understand why it was sent to take down very weak Axis aircraft at BR 1–3.

13

Maybe because the two games have two completely different match mechanics? Enlisted only allows 2 planes out, of which aren’t even being used all the time. A fighter without a payload is not worth using in this game.

Everyone knows attacking ground targets is the primary objective. That’s where the battle is. In warthunder, the battle is in the air. Doesn’t matter if you have a bomb at all.