Reduce the score of the 25K event

Guys, how’s everyone doing with completing the 25K event?

  • Easily done
  • Takes some time to complete
  • Takes a lot of time to complete
0 voters

Guys, I think the current score for the 25K event is too high. To reach this 25K score, I have to spend a lot of time, sometimes playing six games or even more. I feel like the nature of the game has changed—it feels like the game is playing me. I suggest reducing the score so that you can get 15K in two days. Do you guys agree?

2 Likes

Do you support reducing the 25K event points?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
1 Like

Six games in two days seems reasonable, tbh. These events aren’t there just to give stuff to players, they there to encourage people to play more.

2 Likes

I usually get it done in 3-4 games but i don’t mind if they reduce it back to 20k

4 Likes

I think they should return to the way they did it with the saboteurs with rewards at every 25k but you can also grind everything.

8 Likes

It does take one or more games but it’s not long… I still want it reduced back to 20k… increasing objective score is a pitiful excuse for making the event longer to complete.

This is exactly what I wanted.

It’s really frustrating sometimes. The opponents aren’t very aggressive and just hide in the back sniping, so I have to follow along and grab pathetic points in the match.

If you don’t have anything else going on, you can do it, but quite a few people won’t put all their time into it.

1 Like

20K is also a pretty good choice; sometimes the extra 5K just takes more time.

1 Like

An average veteran player can achieve 25k in 3-4 matches, depending on the intensity of the match.

I wouldn’t say it’s difficult. But I don’t see any reason why we, as players, shouldn’t support reducing the task requirements. Those who oppose it seem to be very proud of having to play specific video games for two or three hours every two days.

Come on, it’s 2026, and games are increasingly trying to respect players’ time.

1 Like

It’s like this, spending a lot of time on games isn’t right.

That was peak event design.

1 Like

I know it’s not really fair to compare myself to the average Joe, but I usually get these done in 3-4 games tops if I have consecutive good games bad games drop that to 5-6.

What I found to be the problem with the 25K events is that veterans can do it in 4 matches or sometimes even less when they play in the right BR and right equipment (but they farm newbies) while everyone else will have to play 10 to 12 matches to get the event done.

Sure its nice that the devs increased XP gain from playing the objective, however when the match is so unbalanced that one side cant even get near the objective than the XP gain is abyssmal.

3 Likes

But at the same time, there also needs to be a corresponding reward.

I don’t really understand if those who voted against it spend the whole day just playing Enlisted.

1 Like

This is really tough for new players.

no,i just wanna finish their shit event,after that i can enjoy the game

1 Like

In my opinion they should ditch the “Get xxx points” type of events alltogether.

It only encourages people to get it over and done with as fast as possible which means the lower BR’s gets flooded with vets sealclubbing left and right.