There are hundreds of soldiers in each battle, accompanied by armored vehicles and aviation. It all reconstructs a true historical battle atmosphere, like famous Omaha Beach landing.
If you lose the true historical , and realistic, then you lose everything.
It’s a game to reappear the war, not a sports game like NBA2K or FIFA.
Give the weapons their own battlefield!
True. If I don’t care about authenticity, why don’t I play BFV? This game involves driving a tank for 5 minutes, getting stuck in the terrain for 3 minutes, and infantry flipping across windows 10 times and getting stuck by window 5 times. If it weren’t for historical and equipment diversity, I wouldn’t have played it for a long time.
Give my shotgun a proper range
Balance first
realistic 1st
realistic if there are limitations
Balance if there are no limitations
Realistic first, for balancing, just make people fight each other with same gear level. Im here for authentic historical battle feel not jumpshot/slide/lean shoot.
Okay, 90% of all German soldiers are now equipped with just Kar98s.
Soviet soldiers are mowed down by their own machine guns if they don’t run directly at the enemy.
And Americans have 10x more tank and aircraft than anyone else.
Japanese are lucky to get a functional rifle.
99% of your time is spent sitting in a foxhole waiting for something to happen.
There are no respawns.
And you no longer have any choice for you load out.
Gonna disagree here. As a game, balance is paramount. Yes, historical accuracy is important, but secondary to game balance. You can always go watch a documentary if you disagree.
The game currently already historical enough for me, im not seeking 100% historical accuracy
Im not touch that context tbh, i just want the weapon stay in current campaign, just make matchmaking better (or exist because there is none), thats it, because dev currently slowly move away from current system (with merge u can see moscow squad fought in normandy), it doesnt make sense for me.
are we talking about balance of the game or balance in the game
to me balance of the game should be %30 realistic and 70% balance
but balance in the game should be at %70 realistic and 30%balance
Make it realistic and then apply balance where needed.
as much i’m a sucker for true historical stuff,
we’re kinda too far deep into this mess ( arcade ) for that.
and, it’s not a genre for everyone. if it is, can only be achieved through pves.
hence, i suppose making in realistic should be the go.
and through customs improvements achieve and let the players make true historical matches and what not.
even though. what we tested in the second phase test of the upcoming merge still leaves me doubtful and full of questions about the direction.
Let the Tiger roam in Africa, cowards
personally i prefer what that one guy said “semi realistic” like current campaign system except with tech tree and restriction but it hard to make sense
as long as people are using real ww2 guns like it was the thing in H&G, its fine by me.
I just dont want more prototype weapons getting into progression like AS-44
yea those thing being premium are fine to me but then again i love using “unique” gun
They try so hard to balance thing, and fail after that. Berlin fine without new level tbh, im okay with IS2 1944 and KT H, but with STG44? it break balance, now noone play Normandy because STG44 already there. Then AS44, its premium gun, then DF slap bayonet, and put it as counter for STG44, dude, really?
even if soviets had modern day equipment in Berlin, Axis would still spank them hard because its not a gear issue, its the player base.
Cause most soviet mains wont leave their comfy moscow and stalingrad bot farms.
Balance. Let online shooter be competitive.
Leave realistic for events.