Listen if a lot of people dont concord with you, the answer are two
“You are the one wo have rigth and the rest are retarded”
“you are retarded and the other have surrender to understand you”
Try to figure in this case what is the correct answers, but im sure you choice the wrong one, now if you permit i go
Well thanks for clearing that up, I couldnt tell.
Well theyr backing up the above quote.
Totally same thing as red square. You win.
I am too arrogant and I have no reason to believe that I have miscalculated somewhere, so 1 option.
Permit
Cool
Because its redundant what you like.
Guess most people just wanna do more with a Panzer IV than just greyzone-camping and playing RNG against the T-50.
And saying sth. like “The Soviets are better but I like to camp with the Panzer IV and use the 39m” is still meh.
And for the 1000th time I dont give a crap “muh skill” as even you dont believe in that crap. You only use it now because its something which cant be measured.
I guess as you are nobody but a fellow player with an attitude, what you like/think is equally redundant and no one gives a crap you cant handle how it is.
This is how the game is. deal with it.
High ROF in low TTK games, like Enlisted, is always superior to a low ROF weapon.
Moscow Axis has worse stuff than Moscow Allies. That’s why people prefer other campaigns, it’s that simple.
T-50, T34, PPSh, IL-2 are unparalled in the campaign.
I remember seeing you somewhere in the bottom of the scoreboard so I’d say that your personal preference doesn’t really matter.
Its undeniable fact that soviets get better equipment, its not about liking or thinking its a fact.
Regardless how skilled you pretend to be it still remains as a fact.
Well, no its not. Much like LMG’s in past got nerfed beyond useless due to skilled people like you whining over it, same can be done to soviets in moscow.
Or add equilevant equipment for germans.
I remember seeing you on the bottom of a dozen games…course I dont have any screens to back that up, but I remember it because its an easy way to attack your credibility just cos… what is this school yard playground?
Its the other way round, rate of fire is superior in high TTK games…why…because in High TTK 1 shot isnt enough so you need to hit more times, therefore having a higher rate of fire is superior…
What credibility when the arguments are from clownschool? You have none in the first place, hence you obviously have no idea what you’re talking about and everybody here knows it. It’s a clownshow and you’re the star.
PPSh kills with 3 bullets close up, or 4?, PPSh RPM is what? 1600bpm? BA is no counter to SMG’s in Moscow, as I’ve stated before. I’ll add some emo-dots here… Just to…
About ROF and TTK, did you get a brain-stroke or what? Just what?
At least two by now.
Two more than you.
If everyone would have a similiar gameplay preference like you (and found a magical way to dogde laws of math) Moscow Axis wouldnt be dead/ only alive during events.
Yet it is. So however you view the game, its not mainstream. So stop pretending that people view the game like you. Like you said:
congratz, by your logic 2 people with equally redundant opinions agreeing with you. you have won sir…again…school play ground
So…is this where I post a montage of screenshots from clown school or what.
ppsh about 1250 rounds per min, 20.8 per second, 2.8 bullets fired in the .1 seconds it takes 1 shot from a rifle with no travel time to down you. best aim for the head.
Well actually majority runs with vitality perk.
quite sure the remnants of credibility were lost at point when BA > PPSh CQC debate began.
You probably should.
We’re talking max-X weapons, K98 maxed and PPSh maxed. 20,8 rounds in the first second can kill how many players? How many players can the 1 headshot round kill? I’d love to say that there would be bullet-penetration but there isn’t, so 1?
You can kill 1 player and it takes 1s to chamber round number two.
How many bots have you killed with PPSh?
EDIT I made the question clearer for the bot here.
EDIT 2, it seems it’s 1s per shot.
In what…perfect conditions as in you won the first engagement and the rest of the player you killed has his squad all sitting there perfectly in your vision at point blank. Heaven scenario.
…veteran players don’t often have their bots running with them…they have them stashed using single soldier command somewhere near by. So unless you bush wack them before this (which is a positioning advantage) for that extra 20 bullets, you still only have one kill
3 is more than one. Is average on the forum…
You are the one who keeps saying that drums are bad because noob people dont use them correctly… let alone the basic laws of math. So why should we consider that again if nobody agrees here?
When you die, you’re “transferred” the to next bot and you’re obfuscated or disorientated - due the fact that the bots seem to be staring which wherever - and when that high ROF SMG get’s to you’r clump of bois you’re simply fucked.
SMG’s are superior on CQB than bolt action rifles because of the ROF. That’s why they were invented in the first place.
And you can’t really miss with PPSh. You’ll waste 2-3 extra bullets before you switch targets with it due the delay of kill-information (or even 4-5), but as a completely recoil-less, no dispersion whatsoever, best gun in the game hands down, will mow everything down quicker and neater than your mother a strawberry pie.
In the perfect scenario, due the delay in the server, PPSh kills you just as fast as you kill with BA, and what’s even better - if you didn’t land a perfect headshot with BA he’s only knocked down. With PPSh, you’re dead.
With HEADSHOTS ONLY VALLUTAJ VS UNFIXED, or SIMPLE VS b1t, n00bnoob and VAzilijisaijtsej998 or Xinjho74923, PPSh > BA rifles in CQB.
who cant miss with ppsh…noobs? vets? average joes? anyone? everyone? pretty naïve to think the majority of players can land more than 10-20% of their shots over all
you are now hung up completely on a PPSH scenario its heaven scenario versus a weapon that isnt in the same class. For noob and average players, yeah the odds would be better on the ppsh. Equal above average players, could go either way. Thats saying something in the PPSH heaven scenario. Because in the reverse conditions the ppsh is much worse off.
And yet you are saying BA > PPsh in cqc, regardless the BA requires 100% accuracy every time you shoot. Theres no follow up shot coming like automatic weapons has.
I thought you started the debate of BA being better in cqc than PPSh ?
But fine, ppsh vs any germut smg in moscow is still by far better.
Uhm well, no.
Since you cant make up your mind here is this skill issue or what ever, lets make the godlike screnario then.
2 guys 100% accuracy, with BA with said accuracy you take out 5 enemies in 3-5 ? seconds ?
With PPSh with said accuracy you take out 71 people with said accuracy in 2-4 seconds ?
100 accuracy players, you trade 1 for 1, 50/50 chance of winning who is quickest on trigger, who spots who first upon respawn (happens all the time in game)…bots wont be visible because such players would go in 1 at a time. Lets just say no one else interferes, rifle squad as 2 more lives. that’s less than 50 50 odds in ppsh favor. but lets say it is. That’s not good odds on what is supposed to be your heaven scenario… You wont get anywhere near those odds in a rifles heaven scenario at long range open ground