Tested in custom game where both sides are 100% bots except me. Have tried many times but always got the same result. Soviet bots are way far better than german bots
Perhaps this is due to the arming of the Soviets. The Soviets have much better initial samples of weapons in Berlin than the German ones.
Bots also in my experience benefit from rate of fire a lot more than they do accuracy, and german weapons tend to be slower firing but more accurate than their russian counterparts
Did you test it for both attack and defence for both sides?
I think that bots could be better at getting to the point than actually defending it (Just look AT how your bots behave when you Tell them to stay in a room). And since Allies are on attack for the most of the time in Berlin it can leave the impression that their bots are somehow better.
this is actually a good experiment.
have you tried the other way around?
It is interesting. But we should have more datas and experiments before concluding.
the reason why, especially in berlin, is because the have the ppd / ppsh one of the two. while the germans as smgs they only get the mp 3008.
rate of fire actually count. and bots suffer from those weapons.
damage is one of the other thing.
in my opinion, they should rewamp the whole gear for bots, because they are next to somewhat be useless.
they have a good aim, but only when stationary on objectives.
i’m working on it, but it’s taking me so much time…
They dont use any mp.
Or not?In Moscow, bots use only sniper and common rifles “first level”.
In Tunisia, the Italians have a beretta m1 for 40 rounds, and the British have a Thompson.And also a common rifles.
In Normandy, it seems only rifles.
In Berlin, I don’t know what they have.
Be interesting to, see reversed results,
And also, if you have other campaigns, maybe you could do it both sides?, for which ever you have etc