Possible ACP event options

85 years ago, on July 8, 1941, the Izhora Plant began manufacturing armored vehicles with 45 mm guns based on the ZIS-5.

At the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, the Izhora Plant was one of the leading enterprises of the Soviet tank industry. In addition, there was an Armored Institute at the Izhora Plant, which was later renamed NII-48. In the summer of 1941, a group of NII-48 engineers proposed the idea, which had been expressed even before the war, of booking production trucks and turning them into improvised armored vehicles. In the shortest possible time, a prototype of such an armored vehicle was manufactured on the chassis of a ZIS-5 three-ton truck. It was presented to members of the military Council of the Leningrad People’s Militia Army (LANO), after which the release of these armored cars was given the green light. On July 8, 1941, the decree of the Military Council of the Northern Front No. 53/ss was issued, according to which the Izhorsky Plant was obliged, in addition to the existing program, to produce 20 “installations of 45-mm guns on a semi-armored ZIS-5 machine.”

(With a 45mm cannon)
Additional shield covers were installed on the truck in front of the wheels of the gun, so that the crew was protected from the front and sides by armor. Inside the body, seats for crew numbers and ammunition nests were made. The cannon itself was mounted on the machine so that it could be quickly removed and re-installed. To simplify this procedure, a special device was installed at the tailgate. There were not enough 45-mm guns in Leningrad, so some of the armored cars were made with the installation of 20-mm ShVAK aircraft guns on a special machine.


(20mm ShVAK)
In total, the Izhora Plant handed over to the army from 200 to 250 armored vehicles on the ZIS-5 chassis. They were actively used during the defense of Leningrad.

what do we need?
  • Оnly 45mm cannon
  • Only 20mm ShVAK
  • Nothing
  • Two at once
0 voters

I think it would be better to see a cannon in the event, and with an autocannon in an alternative pumping for “Legacy units” (joke)
Both will be great for events.

2 Likes

Since we have the Stummel a 45mm shouldn’t break the balance

It would be nice if these could replace some of the main premium half tracks so they could go in the tech tree as APC 2 or something.

1 Like

Yes, but I don’t think the developer will do that… Although I would like to see the development of this class.
i (9)
SdKfz_179_Bergepanther,_Musée_des_Blindés,_France,_pic-7
The USSR and Japan also have something similar, but I will search for Archives for a long time. :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

M3A1 half-track could still be added to the US tree. Wouldn’t cheat the buyers because some US tanks are buyable in the USSR tree too. Although the USSR getting it before the US is actualy insane.

3 Likes

I agree, we need it for the second wave of additions, we need more APC
At least 5 for all br

I don’t think there’s enough APCs for all 5 BRs but a tech tree armored one at BR3 for all factions in the tech tree would be great.

2 Likes

We still have options)
The issue of implementation

I mean I think it should just be an APC 2 class at BR 3.

Everything is the will of the developer, our task is only to voice our desires.

Those wouldn’t be APCs.

Why not?

The same reason the 251/9 shouldn’t have, and other halftrack-based combat vehicles should not be. They weren’t used in the troop carrier role and weren’t built for it either. They sacrificed the space for an infantry squad for their new weapons and ammo.

1 Like

And yet it is there.
So we keep going on

The 251/9 was a mistake and they should have known better.

A small mistake, but interesting gameplay

UC It’s also not an APC, it’s something average at the squad level, but we can have two squads in it, 4+9 for example)
And nothing, everyone is satisfied, but 251/9 is not satisfied)

They also arnt “armored” so it should be just PC.