Poll: should BR III play alone?

Mess Room
1

This thread is to collect community feedback on BR 3.

Should it play with only BR 3? Or +/- 1?

Do you care if the que times are longer? (1-2 min possibly up to 5 min)

Let our voice be heard so we can get the BR system fixed and balanced out.

10 Likes
2

It should be +/- 1

I don’t care at all if I have to wait 10 minutes just make BR3 playable

8 Likes
3

it needs to be alone. tank power level increases exponentially after BR2. tier 3 tanks cant win against tier 4 tanks etc.
rare corner cases obv dont count

2 Likes
4

this could be said for almost every tier… t60 cant go against pz3n/pz4f1, t28 cant go against even BR2, not to mention BR3, t34 cant go against panthers, t34-85 cant go against KT

1 Like
5

Two options nice :smile:

i would say yes if it , made all happy, but if some reason that this could not happen. apply below suggestion

i would say yes if it , made all happy, but if some reason that this could not happen. apply above suggestion
If it were to stick to +/- 1 Yes

NO
(1-2 min possibly up to 4 min) same as WT?

But then you would need a option button, that will its self split player base, so it wont happen.

6

All BRs should play “alone”/in ±0 MM. The current factions/queues do have popularity bias anyway.

8 Likes
7

Apparently a lucky shot from T34 85 can kill KT but it requires insane luck I saw it from that one post but yea br3 having it own queue would be nice.

1 Like
8

Every “BR” ( thinly disguised year of war with mashed up bad ideas) should be matched, if this game ever gets out of beta and becomes what they inferred.

9

I think the current spread could be fine, if matchmaker…actually tried to match people
Recently the games have had the gear that was a little bit more reasonable (mix vs mix, not outright BR3 vs BR5) and it’s actually kind of fun
but you still get those infuriating matches where one team is running hand me down trash and other team is fully stacked with the best stuff out there

10

There should be 3 queues:

BR - I + II + III
BR - II + III + IV
BR - III + IV + V

So a player will have an incentive to research new squads and weapons.

1 Like
11

Would rather go with:
BR1
BR2-3
BR4-5

1 Like
12

Two Queues are not enough.
There should be a minimum of 3.

13

So BR2 and BR4 will always be the “bad” BRs then…

At least with +/-1 every BR (apart from BR1) gets the chance to be the upper BR in the match.

1 Like
14

BR 2 and 3 simple as. As far im concern, BR 3 shouldn’t be fighting against BR 4

15

i think BR3 should play only with itself. and i mean, ONLY. if not enough players queue for ONLY BR3, fill with bots. no BR spilling, no up/downtiering. just BR3, to duke it out in ALL available maps. and add some gear from BR2 and BR4 to BR3, so it is the most pack full of different gear and vehicle choices possible, within reason, obviously.

that way you have BR1/2 low level gear, BR4/5 high level gear, and BR3 with the highest selection of gear.

and for the love of god, folder all those bolt action rifles into a couple folders, no need to increase grinding in the research tree, is already long enough without them.

16

I think for the moment the BR 3 system is fine. If I give myself a DP 27 there should be no reason why I can’t fight in every single Eastern Front battle from beginning to end! Or the M1 Garand!

In fact BR 3 can be a fair compromise for certain things, such as items that immersively only fit in early war but they were thrown into BR 5. I’d be willing to compromise and move certain things to BR 3

I think it’s fine and should remain as it is……for now

17

Either would be better than what we have now :slight_smile: so Yes