I think i’ve missed that thing.
But to get answer from users of all spectrum, This would be a better way I suppose.
i could give you some screenshots of me screwing jumbos over in the panzer 3N if you want
WTF is the Emil even mentioned - someone is taking the piss!!
Just for reference - both of the 2 Emils made had been destroyed (1) or captured (1) by the January 1943… on the Eastern Front!
Oh and game design by popular vote is a crap idea in the first place.
but the memes, just think of the memes
Yeah just take this as a meme,
There even was a Ford mustang 1969 with AI armed with RPG at passenger seat.
I can give you video of me mostly failing to demonstrate OP-ness vs Pz3’s - at least 1 was an N…
These results are biased. I answered “Fix gray zone first”, and you did not even mention it though it was recommended by others in the original post as well.
How could anyone even suspect that a poll about a single vehicle being OP would end up being biased
Very nice work man i hope that you make more of this POLLs.
let’s face it they want the tiger or a phanter so I see no harm in giving the Americans this
Goodies
I wish to have such a table for every tank in Enlisted, with actual Enlisted damage models.
I’d rather see Tiger vs M18, so it would be the same exact Jumbo vs Puma situation.
And whiners from both sides could stick each other’s foot in their mouths and shut up.
i would like to use the m18 10x more than the jumbo faster, more powerfull, no armor best armor (-main puma probably)
I’m in the minority but I hope they won’t.
I like that there is different balance of things in differant campaigns and that different sides don’t just have the exact equivalent. This isn’t a pure tank game, and you don’t need tank balance to be able to take it out with a bomb. And it is only a hard nut to crack from the front.
My feeling is that by complaining about things like that, they are steadily taking fun out of the game.
Obviously people wanting the Jumbo removed have the opposite view.
And I played all campaigns and mostly as Germans on Normandy. Jumbo is hard to kill, but I never had any great trouble with it. I managed to take it out shooting at the front weak point, and out-flank it. I took it out as infantry. And if it is too well positioned, you can still take it out with a single well-placed bomb.
Also I don’t know why are there a million threads about the Jumbo and not the T-50 i Moscow? I’m not sure I would nerf it either, but it might be even more OP than the Jumbo…
nice, “jumbo OP” is finally canon complain
Saw you once in battle, frankly said, you are a utter noob.
Some more things, as this poll mimicks somewhat what goes on in our little country with “polls”. You asked opinion about a thing, for which you receive answer from mostly those who are pissed off by the Jumbo, definitely not a representative thing.
You have not asked
- the experience of the responders which is a major flaw in such polls. How do you know that the 100-120 persons who want changes are not playing since only 1 month or so, and will be gone in the next few weeks?
- whether those are not German-only guys hating USA-everything, and would answer “nerf/remove” to M1 Garand, Thompson, Rhino and just everything the opponent has?
I played many games where US was stopped even with some extra +few hundred tickets in Airfield, and many where wasn’t, so if you pick one specific item that seems too strong, removing it from game will not necessarily make the game better balanced.
Not saying that I’m right in any of the above, but they feel valid concerns.
I hope devs will use their common sense and change only things that they wholeheartedly agree with, and what they think the game will be better with, regardless of players’ current opinion.
Eg. a mobile AT turret assembled in hangar then rolled out to instakill the Jumbo might be released within days. Will poll results still be valid then?
This is getting better and better.
Nah I would want apds firefly so I can ammon them from everywhere