[POLL] Is Jumbo OK with its Balance at Normandy?

This comment has nothing to do with mine. My comment lists my priorities, and the Jumbo isn’t one of them, period.

So you want more objective variety without first balancing the game ok coach, have fun with ai

You definitely aint.

2 Likes

I love this kind of poll mindsets.

“BRuH iF tHe PolL reSulT is NoT iN mY fAvoUr iT muSt bE bIaSed bY WhatEvErbOos.”

And they say that the Blightown is toxic… :clown_face:

6 Likes

Idk This poll wont solve anything since the issue is not necessary the Jumbo but rather Keofoxs statement about the Jumbo/ historical “accuracy”.

I am the one that determines what I mean by what I say. The very moment I need someone else to define the meaning of my words I will give you a call.

I’m not the one running a poll and claiming it’s legitimate

Full ai isn’t a problem for you

Except mostly it can’t - don’t care what WT stats say - clearly Enlisted does not use that.

In his game the front armour or P3’s and P4’s is just as immune to the Jumbo as the Jumbo is to the P4 - which is to say you can occasionally get a penetration - but when you do with Jumbo you sometimes get 1 crew kill, very occasionally 2.

When the P4 penetrates it gets minimum of 3 on a full crew, sometimes OHK the tank.

Well It happens too quite to say “Occasionaly”, I would say “Most of the time”.

I could easily penatrate both P4 and P3s Front armour with no Difficults.
But both P3 and P4s Only could penetrate its MG port and Hatch, which is preety hard to hit especially when Its on move. or they could damage its track or the barrel, which almost always jumbo could strike back.

1 Like

You got lucky :slight_smile:
Either that or they finally fixed the armour problem??

If they have then I better go back to Normandy and cash in before they nerf the Jumbo!

Sorry, but Enlisted is using SAME WT armor mechanism. Only matter is Enlisted is using older, and reduced shell’s fragments. After all, it is Dagor Engine.

Oh yeah, M4A2, EVEN M8 Scott can penetrate god damn Pz3 and Pz4’s front armor. If you missed shot ,died and think it is unbreakable, just play Battlefield V. Seriously it is more easier to play tanks.

Actually, They can’t even nerf more, Only solution is delete the jumbo. And also, Armour problem? Only problem was Overpowered Slopped armor in Berlin. Ya know T-34 keeps blocks the Pz4 and Panther’s 75mm cannon?

I didn’t say htey nerfed it - read again

If it was a bug or not, Try it now

You’ll easily penetrate both p3 and p4s front, only if they havent made an angle.

M8 Scott has HEAT, which is arguably bette than hte AP shot, and since htey are, apparently according to you, using an older version of WT mechanisms - no they are not using WT mechanisms, because WT doesn’t use those mechnisms any more…

You know using the same background engine doesn’t mean they are doign the same thing, right?

Here’s 5 minutes of Jumbo struggling with P3’s:

1 Like

Is your jumbo stock? Your shot dispersion looks preety wide in that video, But mine dosent.

Yes - just the 2 stars - spent all my silvers on planes during that campaign - might try that then - but even upgraded you aren’t getting any extra penetration.

Would also point out that at he range you killed that P4 it would have your MG port firmy in its sights pretty easy too - so first shot that gets a clean hit is goign to win!

1 Like

Well what i was talking was about dispersion.

Yeah it may be, but Not like jumbo, which can penetrate most of P4s Front now, Panzer 4 needs to aim to the small MG port-which takes few more times in aiming.

Well in some few cases P4 may would get the jumbo,
But mostly jumbo would take the advantage.

First Pazner III, you aimed track and saying no damage.

in 3:22, Second one? you had chance to shoot his side armor, but missed the timing and shot the front slopped/angled one. can’t pen that area in WT too.

Also, you are proving the Jumbo is OP. Panzer IV H can’t survive that long if pz4 had same situation. You fought 2 Panzer IIIs showing your biggest weak point: Side armor, but you survived.