Please If I play lone fighters I do so because I dont want to play with bots

Hello,

Please If I play lone fighters I do so because I dont want to play with bots.

So please remove them from Lone Fighters! I really hate bots and I dislike to play this game with these bots they one shot me in cover.

Also so shady to name bots with players names :frowning: do like in warthunder please.

3 Likes

Do you want to play 3 vs 5 matches?
If not, then you’re gonna have to put up with the bots until OBT starts as are are simply not enough players to fill up lobbies in lone fighter mode.

4 Likes

yes ABSOLUTELY! If there are no players I want 3v3 like in WT SB.

Its actually pretty fun you can see true skill this way.

“You see the trick is to watch what point you cap so that the enemy players are the next country over by the time they see it flashing”

Why did you install Enlisted then?

Lone fighters is not as popular as squads so they have to fill it with bots to avoid having empty battlefields

Nobody wants that

And if you’re talking about warthunder so much…then go play warthunder

If 3v3 is fun, go play CoD WW2
I don’t understand how is it fun to invade Omaha beach with 3 people while the other 3 sit and camp who knows where

1 Like

this can’t work.
maps are too big for just 3v5. and give it time, it’s just a closed beta. wait for open beta.

and honestly, it’s better if there are bots. more xp.

I always love how lone fighter plays just demand for more people to play their gamemode

2 Likes

As it is not possible to force people into playing lone fighters, CBT will continue with having a lack of players in that mode. It is unavoidable.
Also Enlisted was originally not even supposed to have this mode as 1 player 6 bots squads are pretty much its main trademark that makes it so different from the rest of generic WW2 FPS. Thus, it is not surprising lone fighters is a ghost town and when it was suggested for the first time, considerable portion of testers was actually against the idea because it would just divide limited playerbase even further and maps are not suited for this type of a match.

it’s not empty as you might think. i started to play since the beginning of normandy, only this game mode. and it’s… convenient.

there are double xp for soldiers experience. so it doesn’t take ages to upgrade your squads.

Im not considering bots.
But it is true, that it has been a while since I played lone fighters (because every time I did, it felt like forced PVE).

although… i have to agree that… Lone fighter can be described with the following photo:

but, convenient.

i just wish to see more. more of PVE, PVP and time will speek.

1 Like

What a toxic behaviour you have there @73507743 tchof_

I want to play Warthunder with infantry, that’s why I bought this game and that’s why I play it.

Warthunder has realistic, arcade and simulator modes… I never play arcade ground forces it sucks… but maybe other people enjoy.
I don’t enjoy playing with bots and I know of no one that likes it… being killed by cheating mechanics and not being able to flank and make surprise attacks is half of the fun of PvP.

If you want to play with bots you have squads go have fun… I want to play just with players so I can have fun…

1 Like

This isn’t War Thunder with infantry, and it never will be. It is a mix n match from War Thunder’s arcade, realistic and sim modes, but at the same time, it’s none of those.

2 Likes

Yes it’s a flawed game thats why I’m on the forums participating and giving my feedback.

Go google the definition of a forum…

and yet even in beta it’s already better than War Thunder by a fair amount.

Depends of the WT to me definitely still far from WT Combine Forces BR 3.7-4.0 and SB with IVH without post ww2 vehicles.

For what I seen Enlisted air is quite bad, tanks gun traversing is weird and progression is like 4 times worst than WT and warthunder has the worst progression I know of.

Not being able to kill tanks or use other weapons for low skill players is a massacre.

You start off with det packs and tanks, and you get engineers very early. Granted det packs and engineer AT guns take more skill to combat tanks with than using other tanks and ManPAT, they’re still tools available to you.

Too few to go around and equip your soldiers, those with them will most likely be killed by infantry when you need them you don’t have them, miss by a few meters and no damage plus a competent tanker well position will easily brush them off.

Once you unlock engineer you have only one soldier he dies and that Anti-Tank capability is gone.

So a lot of things are stacked against new players, there should be some locations on the map that provide these weapons.

You do realize that with the new campaign, we all just started it at level 1 so I’ve been practicing what I preach until I get dedicated AT.

Oh…so you are one of those

Let me explain it to you what Tcat meant. Enlisted is a realistic FPS game that took vehicle damage models from Warthunder

But this doesn’t mean Enlisted is warthunder with infantry.

Term InFAnTrY tHuNdEr was made up bumbass warthunder youtubers who didn’t play enlisted more than once or twice in their life

Enlisted is an infantry focused game. Tanks are only armoured support vehicles

I win hundreds of battles where my team didn’t even use tanks.

You bought the wrong game…
It’s not our problem that you got upset with warthunder but Enlisted is not and never will be warthunder with infantry

4 Likes