Please give the SU-57 before the US M3 (joke post)

I mean it only fair right? After all if British arent getting their valentine then US cant get their M3 fair is fair.

Some picture for reference i guess.
OMzayYz

6 Likes

Armored half tracks are a premium feature… by that standard it should not be given to allies in the tech tree… however originally their premium apc should have been the M3 instead of clunky POS LVT that’s only use is for blocking doorways.

If you want to use the argument ohh well it was so popular then germany should get the sd kfz 251 without its MG in the same update.

2 Likes

I agree with what you say about the LVT. It’s slow under-powered (IRL the 7 cylinder radial engine worked so hard they had a 100 hour service interval but usually required an overhaul before 100) and has a barn size profile. But it can tried water, it is armored, has a good armament BUT it often doesn’t work well with hilly maps or anywhere it can be seen. In most scenarios I prefer the TT Studebaker. Why the US doesn’t have the M3 is beyond me… however what I will say is that at least US mains get a good TT APC whereas Germany gets a slow Artillery tractor with a horizontal split windshield as an APC which easily takes the cake for worst APC. My hope is Germany gets an Opel Blitz or equivalent for the TT, and the LVT4 is ether retired and replaced by the M3 as a premium or the M3 becomes a event APC. Or I don’t think it’s unreasonable if there was a event version of the M3 and a premium to replace or go alongside the LVT4 which have a different armament or lack thereof. APC’s need an update.

1 Like

Just want to clarify this M3 is GMC not a APC so yea just in case people are confuse.

Here a clearer picture.
yVsl2gu
2H1M5ZD

Obviously this is a possible br1 or 2 tank (hence the joke)

2 Likes