Is the Pershing super weak against explosive packs, the amount of games on Pacific where one EP boom no more Pershing, why did everyone want this in game, is it just the gun, so technically should peek and shoot like using M18.
I expected a detpack to lose a track, kill 1 2 crew, but are we sure it’s not bugged, it’s dying a bit easily imho.
All tanks can get killed by 1 pack - why should the Pershing be any better?
Getting the tank was just to give the Allies equivalent tank options IMO
Still going to die like the rest to the usual suspects.
Well, I remember the t34, used to survive Churchill, Tiger too, but when I check armour it’s only 100m like the Sherman I think, so assuming and will treat it a glass cannon ongoing
Because people are waiting for the Super Pershing, which honestly will die from EP just as any tank in the game
I find it hilarious, soo many people when Pershing, gimme Pershing, it is released, now it’s when super Pershing, gimme m36, from my experience Firefly with new ammo is better.
The lack of binoculars and personal weapons for commander is a real limitation too.
hehe I never liked the pershing anyway. Was always waiting for super pershing. As you say, firefly buff was the main note for me (Allied tank wise)
much more interested in the new tail gunners, and japanese planes.
Personally, I was never excited about the Pershing because I already knew it would struggle against the bigger German cats and the Ho-Ri. I was excited because they promised the Super Pershing (which still won’t be as good as the Tiger II or the Ho-Ri because of the reload rate) and they didn’t deliver, but it’s not the first time developers’ promises have been broken, is it?
As for the M36, I don’t even know why people want it, it will be just like M10…