Spoiler
This isnt something I should be laughing about but I can’t help it
1 Like
A) Someone clearly doesn’t know the crime clearance rates/ dark figure of crime.
B) This is not the Sharia or Christianity in the Dark Ages, where you stone people to death for insulting God.
C) The current head of state and government of one of the 2.5 superpowers is a convicted criminal.
1 Like
But why do so many Chinese defend the exploiters?
1 Like
They even try to reproach for racism or bias.
No, I know many good Chinese players who just play.
And precisely because of such guys, a shadow is cast on other HONEST players from China.
In this game, people with cheats don’t live long.
But this exploit allowed much more.
Within the casino’s accessibility, if you have 213 million silver, you can get yourself 30 units of weapons of each type.
And it’s hard to determine.
They themselves boasted with screenshots, and in the end, they got what they deserved for it.
Not a shadow of pity or empathy.
3 Likes
I’ve never seen you respond so quickly. Just because a small number of players took advantage of what you call the “malicious use of bugs” to quickly earn silver coins, a bug that has existed for over four years was fixed within 24 hours! This is simply a miracle!
2 Likes
Since the very beginning, I’ve always considered Enlisted to be a PvPvE casual shooter. Compared to the competitive nature of Battlefield or Call of Duty , and the realism of Hell Let Loose or Squad 44 , I believe Enlisted found its own niche. Its low skill floor allows most players to get positive feedback by fighting mostly bots. However, we’ve seen all the balance changes and economy system overhauls from DF over the years, which have gradually shifted the player mentality from having fun to playing purely for victory and rewards. I’ve even placed in the top 1% in two of the “Fair PvP” events and earned the unique name decorations, but honestly, it wasn’t fun—it was exhausting, especially when you go to pull out a demolition pack and instead throw a smoke grenade.
11 Likes
This incident has led to a conclusion that the interests of the official are more important than the gaming experience of the players. They only think about how to quickly extract money from the players. They will only make quick repairs when the malicious bug incident only causes losses to their interests. We should thank these banned players for allowing this bug that has existed for more than four years to be fixed. Otherwise, this bug would have existed for 10 or even 20 years.
3 Likes
Dont hate the player, hate the game.
Sure its alot of work - but unless we are talking about old games without any support, then abusing bugs is actually healthy for the game, because it forces the devs to fix them.
Bugs existing is entirely the devs fault, and as such punishing the players for abusing them seems like a poor excuse.
7 Likes
Couldn’t agree more
im a bit retired 
I dont visit the forum as in the past. But people that use cheats should be fired by a firing squad
If its some exploit its devs mistake but if its legit hack well this people definitely wont be getting no funeral ceremony. The parrot never used hacks he was an honorable soldier to the very end just he had his own views
5 Likes
Hes one of the players got banned.
yep
4 Likes
They more likely are no harming ppl just stacking hundreds of boosters to get tons of xp and boosters
Banning them tbf was wrong it would be better to remove the ammounts of silver and fix the bug
But well 
4 Likes
lol you’re absolutely wrong, thousands of people were sitting in AFK farming servers in battlefield 2042 to complete the battlepass there.
Tons of people have been exploiting BF6 too, getting out of bounds of the map and griefing people. I have NEVER seen a person be banned in BF6 for anything besides using 3rd party programs to cheat or saying slurs in chat
4 Likes
213 million silver?
Dear S-G,
He wasn’t doing it in regular matches. He was going into closed custom games.
That completely devalues the efforts of normal players and the grind.
And it breaks the balance and the economy — having 30 RMN-50s is ridiculous. I’m already terrorizing randoms with just 4.
Maybe someone got hit by this accidentally (though I don’t believe that).
If they had been moderate in what they were doing, farmed a little bit instead of being greedy, and didn’t brag with screenshots, it probably would’ve gone unnoticed.
But greed combined with a sense of total immunity leads exactly to this result.
Baszi, greyparrots — those are the guys I actually feel sorry for.
What gets me the most is the way they reacted to the news:
The traces,
The screaming,
The begging,
And the attempt to justify themselves by saying the game is bad.
2 Likes
Regarding this game ban incident, as the person involved, I truly feel deeply emotional. Let me explain to everyone: indeed, we exploited a series of loopholes. If we had been banned immediately, I believe no one on the list would have much objection. Everyone was aware before doing these things that there was a possibility of punishment. Although they did not anticipate such a severe consequence as a permanent ban, no matter how the officials try to disguise it with words, they cannot hide the fact that the officials are ignoring players’ opinions. Treating players’ wealth as their personal property, they use these petty provisions to arbitrarily or even maliciously punish players to extract funds from them. They clearly know that such people exist, and they also know that these people are loyal players who would recharge during the 5th-anniversary event. The officials intended to exploit their final remaining value during this event, and after executing the ban, they grandiosely claim to be acting in the players’ best interest. Their words explicitly indicate that these players affected the normal gameplay of others. But how did they affect it? By using weapons that didn’t give much of an advantage? Even without those weapons, we could still achieve excellent results. So, do you take the same rigorous stance toward cheaters? After all, they merely affect other players, whereas we affected your revenue. The officials allow us to appeal, but when we appeal, they use the excuse of appealing to the community to deceive us. However, apologies, some of us lost the right to speak on our banned accounts when appealing to the community without any reason—the given reason was equally absurd. Similarly, many people on the leaderboard, as far as I know, are mostly Chinese, possibly entirely Chinese. After discovering methods, we continuously improved them to help our fellow compatriots deeply involved in the game. The small size of the Chinese community makes us more united. To my knowledge, not only Chinese players exploited these loopholes, so can I believe that officials are discriminating against Chinese players and deliberately neglecting Chinese-speaking players? It seems that because banned players are all Chinese-speaking, any punishment applied is arbitrary. Among the leaderboard members, some play a leading role in the Chinese community, while many are pillars supporting the professionalism of the Chinese community. Of course, everyone is free to raise questions, including one malicious person from our own culture. Although we know that you are not as noble as you describe yourself, trying to build the image of a so-called righteous person through a series of words, as the Chinese writer Lu Xun once said, ‘A perfect fly is still just a fly.’ We acknowledge that the rules we broke are shameful, but when we recognize the series of actions taken by the officials, we are angry. The officials call it ‘malicious exploitation of a loophole.’ Then, what is malicious? What is a loophole? Is it just because of the game’s mechanics? I believe we can also call the series of official bans a malicious exploitation of the ban mechanism.Maliciously waiting until the event ends to get banned—if the officials are willing to acknowledge this whole series of events, we are also willing to voluntarily admit that we maliciously exploited these mechanisms. The rules provided by the officials are a vague offense, without clearly specifying what the punishment should be. To be frank, today it’s us, but in the future, it could be anyone; the difference is only when the officials want to maximize their own benefit. We support this game.
Only by risking our own accounts have we come to understand how the officials will quickly retaliate to protect their own interests. So, here’s the question: we have endured many game bugs for a long time, so should we respond in the same way? That would further affect everyone’s gaming experience. Why are they indifferent? And if they are indifferent, why are there so many pompous words? You updated the mechanism quickly, which leads to another question: why not extend the effective time of the boost cards? Why is the cap set at 500? If I have three 300% boost cards, that is entirely possible. Do the officials consider reaching a 900% boost malicious?
In subsequent lottery events with so many boost cards obtained, how do you intend to handle them? Reduce the probability of getting boost cards? I doubt you would do that, and ultimately, it’s the players who suffer. This so-called change, at least in my view, rather puts people in a worse situation. The game balance has such a major problem—what adjustments have you made? I think this should be a very important issue for many veteran players—how detailed were your adjustments? I suspect not very detailed; you probably acted impulsively in the community, arbitrarily banning other players’ posts. Do you think they are a minority in this game? Such actions are no different from driving on a highway and complaining why everyone else is going the wrong way—equally foolish.
Players’ resentment runs deep. You might ignore this article or block it for various reasons, but contradictions always exist; they don’t disappear just because people close their eyes. Will everything you do make others believe you? Could the officials deliberately deceive players for their wealth when they know the game can no longer continue? Of course, this is only my guess. After all, all you ever say is that, despite this happening, it doesn’t mean we will give up this game. Like the old deserter system, why not optimize your laughable matchmaking system—you know very well who is affected. Is it only skilled players? Don’t lower-ranked players in a match affect others’ gaming experience?
I don’t lack games to play. Regarding account bans, I only feel regret. There shouldn’t be any malice between players in our view, and I will also remember the time spent playing this game. Perhaps in the future, at some unclear time, we will fight side by side in some unknown game. Players will always exist, but the officials, I think, will be exactly the opposite.The text uses machine translation, sorry for affecting your reading.
5 Likes
Dear Developers,
Yesterday, I discovered that my account has been permanently banned due to alleged exploitation of a game flaw. I deeply regret this situation.
First of all, I acknowledge that exploiting a game mechanic to earn silver is an unfair practice, and I sincerely apologize for my actions. However, don’t you think a permanent ban without any prior warning is overly severe? I have been playing this game for nearly five years and have contributed valuable feedbacks on the forums. Throughout this time, I have never violated any other game rules.
In fact, I only used the exploit about five times over the past month or two, gaining no more than two million silver in total. I decided to do so only after learning about it from friends and noticing that previous users had never received any warnings, let alone punishments.
Because of this, I believe a significant number of those banned in this wave are actually loyal players like me, who used the exploit quite sparingly. Many of us had been aware of the method for some time but refrained from using it until we saw that the developers had taken no action against it. We were always cautious not to disrupt game balance.
Therefore, I feel the punishment is unfair. I hope the severity of the penalty can be reassessed based on the amount of silver gained, rather than issuing permanent bans indiscriminately. Alternatively, if you choose not to reconsider, wouldn’t it be fair to also identify and take action against those who exploited the flaw earlier and more extensively? Every one of their soldiers had already been equipped with various event weapons and sabers as early as last year.
Taking equitable action against all violators, or re-evaluating the permanent bans imposed on a minority of players, would constitute the fair approach expected by the player community. Failure to do so will only provoke further doubt and dissatisfaction
6 Likes
8 Likes