It’s been a year since the game is out, add an option to opt out of conquest already.
It’s not fun, it’s not engaging. The only thing Conquest mode does is make me want to rip my eyes out so I never see it again.
It’s awful in EVERY POSSIBLE WAY.
It’s been a year since the game is out, add an option to opt out of conquest already.
It’s not fun, it’s not engaging. The only thing Conquest mode does is make me want to rip my eyes out so I never see it again.
It’s awful in EVERY POSSIBLE WAY.
My favorite is getting a booster and then just knowing I’ll get conquest
sadly, custom matches didnt fix this issue for us.
screw conquest. insta quit .
Although I don’t feel as strongly I really do feel like conquest is kind’ve “just there”. It not only adds nothing to the game but really highlights the flaws of it.
Enlisted is a game that benefits from objectives making players establish a “front line” or at least a dedicated zone of conflict that moves with the objectives.
Conquest removes this dynamic by having 3 static points equally spaced from each other that just devolves into players running circles on the main the game just feels like a less polished version of one of the battlefields at that point.
What makes enlisted great is it’s pacing and blend of (lite)historical realism and arcade fun, when you have a game mode that breaks that pacing all you’re left with is a discount battlefield game.
Every. Single. Time. Or one of those games where you load in with 1 point taken and the second already falling.
I don’t see why you have to run around, if team takes two points and can hold them, its down to holding, and the ones got itchy mouse finger, can go assault 3rd point, and get there k/d
You can, and I’ve had some decent matches. It just doesn’t really suit enlisted.
Last night I was playing conquest on Tunisia and with the skill disparity between axis and allies right now it was almost boring holding C and B with assault teams harassing at A.
I hate rolling over the enemy team, I want good matches that I feel like I need to work to win.
ngl, its boring as hell.
i remember my first conquest match in alpha after 3 or 4 invasion maps, thinking , this is fked up, not for me. didnt change my mind over the mode after all this time.
even the ones i stay and play, i get no rewarding fun from doing so.
invasion in squad mode, its where the game shines in my eyes, winning or loosing.
i can say the same over lone fighters, but i m happy i can avoid it since it was made.
Agree
Oh it is, but my excuses for it being in rotation, is, that atm playing axis, Normandy, if i have say Battle task to get a capture point, its a handy map to have in
Edit: my bad to OP, i would agree with the opt out, option for players ofc, just that it be not totally removed from rotation etc.
Conquest is way too small to enjoy with only 3 points, it they made it 5 just like that Berlin map alot more people would enjoy it, and I would enjoy it alot more if it lasted a bit longer
Once the population of this game increases sufficiently, maybe they can implement the Map and Game Type voting system that MWO uses. It is way better in at least reducing the type of matches you get, and helps promote the maps you do want to fight on.
I don’t mind Conquest, but I’d rather play Attack/Defend. And TBH, they need to make Invasion / Assault about Zone control and not a Capture point. Would work way better with this games Mechanics IMO.