i mean,
you are not wrong.
And thats a problem, maxed thompsons kill axis beautyfully, but their sights are big bs(and carbines too).
change your name in âgermany suffersâ at least i dont need to waste time reading this.
2 Likes
What, criticism of American vehicles is germany suffering now? Get a fucking grip i literally said they should have better vehicles if they were actually counterable, who doesnât want to sling 90mm HE from a Jackson or actually be able to hurt a panther from range but in the same vein, the panther can pen the jackson and the panzerfaust would actually be useful at countering the allied forces sat 100m back in the grey zone since the Jackson isnât rolling bunker
1 Like
nope, they said that because you are saying that allies are much better than the axis with shaky arguments at best also keep in mind the jumboâs sole reason to exist is maps like AF, D-day, and the other beach map
The panther has a listed penetration of 185mm with apcbc and 250+ with apcr, the jumbo has a listed plate effective thickness of 142mm so why canât the panther pen the jumbo frontally unless you completely remove the angle of the plate with elevation, furthermore how is the jumbo even remotely close to the pz4h, the 4h is a mediocre gun on a lightly armoured chassis that canât take a hit or deal any significant damage especially when you factor in infantry weapons, the PIAT is just a free instakill on pz4s and the bazooka works at range but the sturmpistol hardly hurts stuarts and the panzerfaust canât front pen it so itâs still worthless. You. Cannot. Put. An. Impenetrable. Tank. In. A. Game. Without. A. Plausible. Similar. Tier. Counter.
Jumboâs shot is m72 that has no more than 93mms of pen, m4a2 is that, sturmpistole can easily kill most allied tanks, donât know about m10 since those are a rarity upon the battlefield.
Youâre right, we should switch m10 out for m26 since both of would be immune to all weaker guns, both have to aim for weak points on each other, and both will destroy every single weaker tank with ease. now do I want Pershing to get added? No of course not, for the same reason why I didnât want panther; that reason is called powercreep
1 Like
The jackson provides the perfect solution, more firepower but still killable, the same way the tiger would since itâs got weaker armour and less pen, it would also be a better fit fof the maps since it isnât comically long
no m36 jackson only add t 26 perishing problem solved
They have the same gun and the m36 would actually be able to fit into most village maps
I have only a 33% win rate in Normandy as allies. Even when i perform better than an average allied player. This means that the average player will have an even worse win rate than this. Problems are simple there is a lot low lvl players on the allied side which means worse weapons and worse soldiers. smaller squads and no good planes and tanks. (that also means that almost no one has an attacker plane which means allies are unnumbered in the air 2to1) Yet the number of players is the same even on an unbalanced map as D-day âŚ