m1a1 abrams the most balanced
was gunna say doom turtle but Abrams works i guess
doom turtle was already said so abrooms it is, also this is a joke ralin =/
The m26 has a rating of 6.3, which is at least 2 notches above the highest rating in the campaign (Panther A)
Tiger is rated 5.3 or 5.7 depending on the modification (although I do not understand the difference in WT, the engine is slightly more powerful? The turret is slightly different? Minimal difference).
U.S. branch has M4A3 (76) W and M36 GMC, which are just at 5.7 rating and represent serious competition to both Panther and Tiger. I think some of these will show up as an answer to the Tiger.
The M4A3 (76) W looks more logical, because there is already an M10 and a second such machine doesn’t make sense.
If you were joking and I responded seriously for nothing, no problem.
You mean this thing?))
I’d watch a tank like that crawl across the maps of Berlin. I got stuck there today with my T-34, which is considered pretty mobile.
When will tanks finally start to adequately crawl over obstacles and not get stuck on garbage.
4 Likes
it would be funny to see but unlikely considering some call it a super heavy while it’s almost certainly an assault tank, hey like jumbo, but i also won’t use BRs since the panther’s counterpart is a 3.3
In fact, if you consider that the Jumbo’s opponent is a Pz4 H, whose BR is 4.3 and the Jumbo’s is 5.3, it seems to me that this is just the opposite situation.
First the developers gave the stronger U.S. tank, then the other way around.
4.3 can see 5.3, it’s called a full uptier, but a 3.3 can’t see a 5.7
You’re right, but it’s more about putting pairs like:
Ultimately, we should stop at tanks of the same BR for the final levels of the campaign, so that one side does not say that the enemy tank is 0.7-1 BR higher. (We are talking about the full campaign. I hope to see Tiger 1, but no way Tiger 2. Tiger 2 would be a complete absurdity and should remain for Berlin)
Besides, if the Axis have the tank advantage anyway, it is logical that the Allies have the air advantage, just as they do now. The new Thunderbolt is proof of that.
1 Like
that sounds like a fair plan that i would support and yeah kt2 shouldn’t be in normandy, the maps are too campy for it to be balance
1 Like
I’m glad we understand each other. I still want something similar to the P-47, but the Axis had no such planes, so I’m hoping to fix my Fw-190 for resistance.
Honestly I have a hard time imagining what will happen to the planes at high levels. I hope to see a light attack aircraft from the Axis, but there weren’t many of those.
ironically enough the bf110 is similar to the thunderbolt just has CAS guns instead of a bomb, though this should be fixed to actually deal damage to tanks, though yes i do want the fwk190 fixed and maybe they could add the 75mm gun duck with AP/HE belts?
1 Like
I still think it’s much bigger and slower than the p-47. The guns can kill a plane quickly (and sometimes not at all), but require a lot of skill and ammo economy. The 8 p-47 machine guns work much easier and more reliably on average.
Also in my opinion more missiles are better than fewer but bigger ones. And the bomb. A bomb is universal.
You mean those crazy planes with the huge cannon? No, please)))
I would be happy to pick shells for the 37 bf110 cannon, the armor-piercing belt could pierce US tanks, especially the light ones. It doesn’t work now as far as I can see.
1 Like
i guess just our difference since i think the bf110 is very capable but there is 1 plane that should 100% be buffed imo and that’s the 109g-10 and what i would do is to swap the 20mm gunpods for the 30mm
i dont understand why they wont give the jumbo the option to upgrade to the 76 mm cannon like some of them had they salvaged some off of dead tanks
M4A3E2 Assault Tank - postwar nickname “Jumbo” - extra armor (including 1 inch on front, making it able to withstand shells from the German 88 milimeter guns), vertical sided turret , but about 3-4 mph slower at 22 mph. Built by Grand Blanc May-June 1944. Some rearmed with 76mm guns from damaged tanks
The jumbo model is crooked and annoying.
The Panther has obvious vulnerabilities to suitable guns.
Jumbo vulnerabilities are negligible and often give errors when half a dozen shots on a green marker do not yield a penetration.
A long-barreled jumbo will punch a tiger anywhere in the forehead, and a tiger will punch it in 2 pixels of machine gun, just like a pz4. This will be a silly final confrontation of the campaign. The tiger and m4a3 76 are much better at piercing each other
no there not man the a4 is regular Sherman with 76 mm canon the jumbo had a 76 mm version we should have gotten it over the m10 trash that we have now we all kno why u want the a4 so it will die even easier when tiger comes so you can stomp the allies into the dirt
1 Like
nothing pens from the front ive tried it shrugs off det packs i threw 5 on the top of it it didnt die no fire noting kept shooting like i wasnt there right now there unkillable from the front and det pack only thing that kills panther is p47 and a20
I almost don’t play Normandy now. Calm down.
I use t34 in berlin and have no problem with panthers. Cannon penetration is similar to the m4a3, armor is even less.
I don’t think you’ve ever shot a jumbo and know how crooked its armor sometimes works, and that even a panther can have no penetration spots.