He asks me to apologize about the bomb issue (which died 40 comments ago), not about the insults… “Illiterate” is not an insult, it’s a state of ignorance… It can be solved; his obsession with reviving a topic that is no longer discussed elsewhere is a separate issue.
god dam are you retarded no really are you menatly challenged.
those are the names of the bombs, talking about the nuclear us ‘war crimes’ and not knowing even that
1 Like
No he didn’t?!? He said “if so, I apologize”!!
1 Like
That’s what the bombs were called hjkdasjhkdahjksdakjhdshkaj
That’s what I was thinking!!!
Indeed, as a consequence of using a translator xD in that case I withdraw my insults and apologize, I went off topic.
1 Like
Good to see this is over
war crimes using an explosive shell less then 30mm, using a serrated blade, using a shotgun all were called war crimes at one time or another its not the burn you think it is. yet use of barb wire and mustard gas were not considered war crimes.
No international tribunal has formally declared the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki war crimes, but many legal experts and scholars consider them to be violations of international law and war crimes under modern interpretations of international humanitarian law. The debate centers on whether the bombings violated principles of distinction and proportionality, as the use of nuclear weapons against civilian centers, especially in the manner they were used, would likely be illegal today.
again you have to violate laws put in place before the ‘crime’ not after
1 Like
I understand what you mean, but I don’t know how much sense it makes, or what use is given to the international tribunal when even today war crimes are seen, documented and shown even on TikTok, and yet no one does anything about it…
I’m referring to the Israeli massacre in Gaza, and how, despite bombing civilians, they have the nerve to prohibit humanitarian aid to civilians, even escorting humanitarian planes from other countries and blocking aid ships.
Or the conflict in Ukraine where both sides (especially the Ukrainian side) target civilians.
Well, I guess war crimes are, when it’s convenient for them to be.
War is war and no one enforces laws, not even today. The day will come when humanity will choose peace or die without it.
There are always people who want to muddy the waters and claim that all countries are evil. However, this in no way justifies fascism. If any catastrophe occurs during a war, the fascists who launched the aggressive war should bear full responsibility for it. It is utterly wrong to say something like, “Everyone is a villain; let’s forget the past.” That is a ridiculous and disgraceful statement.Japanese fascists should bear full responsibility for the victims of the atomic bombs.
1 Like
imperial Japan was undoubtedly even worse than the Germans, but even so, to say they should take responsibility for a disproportionate attack is pointless, especially not on civilians…
I’ll explain it in more detail by country:
Finland declares war on Norway and fires 40 ballistic missiles at military bases…
Norway drops 4 nuclear bombs and disappears Finland, including civilians…
According to you, Norway isn’t to blame and Finland should bear the consequences?
I’m referring to the Israeli massacre in Gaza, and how, despite bombing civilians, they have the nerve to prohibit humanitarian aid to civilians, even escorting humanitarian planes from other countries and blocking aid ships.
Or the conflict in Ukraine where both sides (especially the Ukrainian side) target civilians.
i half agree with you, its clear that like past events Israel is using the current incident as an excuse to colonize what remains of the former state of Palestine. on the other hand i believe both parties support a one state solution and neither wish for a two state solution.
now on the matter of the Russian Federation and Ukraine you are just wrong. Russia has long since given up caring about what it hits as long as it hits something. Ukraine has limited itself to military and commercial targets. while russia has on numerous times attacked civilian and residential target. its use of semi/unguided glide bombs is proof enough.
finland invades the rest of europe without declaring war
finland invades poland, norway, denmark,
Finland occupies these countries for years
finland uses chemical weapons on europ
finland starves its prisoners to death while forcing them into hard labor
finland is thrown back to its own borders
finland has tens of thousands of civilians commit suicide rather than surrender to europe
finland prepares a desperate defense refusing to surrender intent on cause as much death to enemies and allies as possible
then hell yes destroy 2 more cities then you have already firebombed
Maybe I’m oversimplifying it, and I’m not really defending them; in fact, they were horrible, especially one unit I won’t mention…
But the point I’ve been trying to make in all this is that the civilian population is not to blame for the decisions made by their government and supported by their army…
A clear example is the number of German women and girls who were brutally raped, because sick German soldiers raped Russian women…
One act of hate leads to another, and in many cases, those who have nothing to do with it are implicated…
I am fully in favor of attacking military personnel, government bases, and command posts if two countries are at war… In the event of a retaliatory invasion, there is no reason to bomb and kill civilians by destroying an entire city of 500,000 people for the sake of killing 40,000 soldiers.
If it attacks the other party for no reason at all, then it is evil. If it is aware that the other party possesses four nuclear warheads and still acts that way, then it is foolish. Moreover, this is a completely unrealistic example. War is not like you slapping me and me slapping you back in return. If you do not completely destroy the war machine and render it inoperable, the war will never end.
The “One Hundred Million Kamikaze” (or “One Hundred Million to Die for the Emperor”) proposed by the Emperor was intended to drain the last drop of blood from every Japanese person, including civilians of course. Should they not be held accountable for this? The battles fought by American and Soviet soldiers on Japanese soil would not have been more humanitarian than the nuclear bombings. The nuclear bombs accelerated Japan’s surrender and saved countless lives, including the lives of American soldiers, naturally.
and if they refused to fight for the leadership, refuse to make weapons for them. the civilians were not forced to fight for the emperor they chose to fight for them. to them the emperor was a god nothing done in his name was forbidden. the bushido code meant that surrender was impossible, until it was not.
And from the perspective of the time and a war that had already had everyone fed up, it may seem great, but look at this.
The US really had air and sea superiority at that point, so strategic bombing wasn’t really that crazy…
I still see the bombing of civilians as a bad thing, but there’s no point in continuing to argue about something we don’t know for sure. Most of the data is classified and we can’t judge from the comfort of peace (of course, I include myself in this).
The same thing happens in the East, the same thing happened with the Templars… the problem is fanaticism…
I guess they thought of multiple options at the time, and that was the best option at the time… As I said before, I have no intention of judging them…
Even less when in games like hoi4 I do what is necessary to win :v
(clearly it’s a joke to calm the atmosphere xD)