Place your bets, will we get a patch fixing some of the reported issues and balancing, or is the next big thing the progression changes?
Hoping the former, I’m always looking for bug fixes, still not looking forward to my lack of choice in the future…
A new battlefield in the Pacific. New armament for aircraft. How about torpedoes for torpedo planes and artillery fire will be conducted from ships?
Incendiary bomb for a premium squad
Actual working plane AT cannons.
Waiting for iwo jima if this time they can make a proper landing map
Believe it or not 30mm plane cannon kill tank, killed a t34 85 d5t in berlin today firing in the back of the turret
Me too
I was more talking about those crappers in Tunisia or the premium Berlin Soviet with the 45mm.
Ah those, but i think they are crap because of enlisted balance, once the BR drop probably they get reverted to a decent state
God, please no. Don’t give that to anyone, it’s gonna be nightmare fuel.
Yeah lots of things to fix. Hopefully they add a bunch of QoL changes, AI improvements, balancing, etc. what do you mean lack of choice though?
B-25 with 75mm cannon when? 
If you go back to the premium sale announcement, they showed a screenshot of what appeared to be a new Pacific map. It doesn’t show much, but it doesn’t look like Iwo Jima. My guess is Pelileu or Luzon.
You have to think like a darkflow developers, why dont add premium incendiary bomb in the pacific? Do pro and con, remove all the con, here now there is no problem 
If that’s what you view the progression change as, you have some messed up logic.
Taking 30 seconds to find a match (unbalanced match) and not even getting a full lobby is not worth “the freedom of choice”
Aww damn. Buzzkill 
Did they change what the roadmap said? Didn’t it used to say “new campaign” which kind of implied another faction post-merge.
Ohh so they were talking about map choice. And yeah, it’s just not possible. The game will die if the player base remains split, and we get long wait times, horribly unbalanced matches, and games full of bots. The game can’t retain new players if they keep getting stomped by high level players using nothing but top gear, and no meaningful action taken to fix it.
Besides, not choosing maps is a small casualty. The tech tree is of bigger concern in my mind. For example, Im not really an aircraft player, and I’m tired of unlocking a bunch of planes I’m never going to use.
Yeah Ive killed a t-34 with the 30mm aswell…by accident…wasn’t expecting it (thought they were just HEIT rounds).
Yeah, I was hoping bigger calibre Anti tank guns on planes would be the next weapon. 40mm, 50mm, 75mm
don’t want torpedoes yet (no reason), don’t really want napalm either lol. I mean Id use it and laugh while doing it…but cancer
I hope its the major update. I wanna do a little bit of tomfoolery with my puma on a high ranked battle
Freedom of choice is always worth it. Your logic is the one that needs some help: What’s the point of better matchmaking (assuming that it’s better when it may not be) if you constantly end up on maps you don’t want to be on, or in game modes you don’t want to play?
The better solution is to allow people to choose EVERYTHING: Campaign, maps, & modes. Simply lock down each map with the future matchmaking rules. Problem solved for those who want choice.
Also, implement the new matchmaking option for those who don’t want to take the time to find a battle. Problem solved for those who want instant battles & the new matchmaking rules.
Glad I could provide you with an example of actual logic!
