I’d take any of these RCAF squads. I’m not picky.
2 Likes
I’m delighted to see the comments from the Enlisted map developers, because Enlisted is back on track. Thank you for your hard work; at least you didn’t abandon Enlisted when everyone was most looking forward to it.
1 Like
If you think the history map created by the developers of Enlisted has imperfections, then help them make reasonable improvements, instead of just complaining. People need to learn to be grateful to go further, understand? (Chinese child)
3 Likes
I apologize for not being able to respond to everyone personally. As you understand, I’ve been working very hard on the location for the past few months and have had almost no time to rest, so I’ll address many of your concerns here. Enlisted is far from abandoned, and work is ongoing. We are currently developing new things to delight players. This includes developing new maps and improving existing ones, as we need to support them. I think this summer and this year will be especially successful for us and you. Despite the dark thoughts you had when were announced infantry in the Thunder and other company projects.
update: Regarding my decision to update Normandy, it’s the oldest map in the project, made using an old pipeline and very old assets. So I really wanted to update it and demonstrate that even a complex map like the Normandy landings can be better, feel better, and be more engaging. We tried to greatly diversify the gameplay and approach to various points, using the gameplay possibilities and what I like about it is that we tried to make it not the same throughout. This approach has proven itself early, but we’ve even improved it now by expanding the battlefield.
11 Likes
Thanks to the developers of the Enlisted map for their hard work. From players to the official operations team, no one has given up on Enlisted; it deserves a brighter future. Players will continue to invest their passion and money to make Enlisted even better and stronger. 
4 Likes
A Game mode seperated from merge with more Historical accuracy would be great i think it could even give a different gameplay or often even a better one!
One Tiger variant was never officially fielded, and another is entirely fictional
I know the Japanese Tiger didnt exist.
I dont know what are you talking about?
Huh? Are you saying we can’t tell the difference here and it only takes effect in the game?
I can’t recall the name of Japan’s BR5 tank destroyer right now. Honestly, barely any Japanese vehicles at BR5 ever saw actual combat, or even existed in real life. On top of that, the Type 5 Ho-Ri is a well-known fake tank in War Thunder, made up by a Korean data compiler just to buff Japan’s lineup.
It’s ridiculous when people go on about how realistic this game is. Those folks are total hypocrites.
The most Japanese tanks in Enlisted didnt see combat.
But you did Talk about Tigers.
If i am not wrong pre merge Enlisted was much more historical accurate!
I think a more Historical mode seperated from merge would most likely the best solution!
5 Likes
That makes sense. Maybe in future events, instead of the devs assigning specific vehicles, they could just set a time period limit for weapons and gear. Players would then assemble their troops, allocate skill points and pick their own tanks before jumping into battles.
This would be ideal, just like the World War mode in War Thunder.
1 Like
I thought more on pre assembled troops!
1 Like
Enlisted historical battles have been categorized by weapon type, but you simply can’t identify them yourself. If you’re interested, you can determine the era of the battle by the camouflage patterns of the combat units.
1 Like
It kinda was…
But for those of you who weren’t there, what you ended up getting half the time was some poor sap who had only unlocked the Stewart, Grease Gun and Springfield getting slapped about by German players with STGs, Tigers, FG-42s and a Ju-188. At certain times of day half the German team would be kitted out like that. So not exactly ‘realistic’ either.
New players were basically turkeys in the turkey shoot for the more advanced players.
Anyone who tells you differently is probably just missing their days shooting up barely armed newbies. I mean it was fun, but it’s definitely a much better game since.
1 Like
New players were basically turkeys in the turkey shoot for the more advanced players.
If its mostly just pre assembled troops!
Than it would be much less unfair!
What BR is this mystical fudging new map on!? After trying both Yanks and Germs on br3 for 8 matches total, one deserter, I am giving up tonight.
That’s what i say. Complaining isn’t going to encourage development. I love the game and the update is good for me.
1 Like
Here here!
1 Like
Good work SnowieW and co.
Love the game. Best FPS on the market and with potential. I don’t see the potential of war thunder. The current players will continue to play vehicles and will complain endlessly about infantry. Also, the current vehicle aspect is trumped by world of tanks. What is world of tanks missing? INFANTRY! What is war thunder missing? INFANTRY! And WOT tank mechanics. Ditch it and we will get about 5k of the war thunder player base…
1 Like
I already responded to this, pal. Your time spent on here is not to encourage or support the devs and the community, you are here to bring them down and ruin the game, which you have done in the past you say…4-5 times? which is it? People like you are the reason there is no damage from kamikaze attack. People like you spent A LOT of time on the forum criticising every good idea and suggesting garbage ideas, and as i said, because you spend SOOOOOO much time on the forum, they go with YOU. Even though you pay NOTHING. Go away pal. Away play war thunder or battlefield.
Perks presets a common sense improvement so ppl like us won’t be getting brain damage upgrating one by one soldier
Useless and pointless weapon downtier
Bomber sigths
Weapon testing
Josef allerberger as a BP soldier
There was kamikaze damage? XD? When honestly couldnt notice about it
No one is perfect i must Say yet i can differenciate most of the times which is either a good or Bad idea
If this is true wouldnt have been alredy banned for not giving constructive critisism is one of the rules of the forum after all
You would be surprised im not nearly as active on the forum as before, there are lots of ppl with +40 days here, this place is not only for suggesting some people just hang out here and chill oftenly
Btw the 15 days ive been on forum are probably fake since i just Open My PC browser and first Tab is this place and i just do My stuff while “farming” forum time
I’m pretty sure that i would have only 4-5 days if it wasnt because that