1
I saw this, but wasn’t this change added quite a while ago? Was it only just that it was unlocked?
So, what is this?
“tunisia cave dom big;Kahif cave village Large”？
2
@MajorMcDonalds
Since the first test of the War Thunder infantry mode was conducted, we have noticed that the improvements in FPS gameplay in it are based on Enlisted, crsed and AM.
Especially the soldier command system, it is a completely visualized upgraded version of the X&K command system for enlisted personnel.
But for a considerable period of time, as the Creative Manager in charge of the Enlisted game, you did not express any opinions on this matter.
As players, we are very eager to know how many years it will take for you to implement this improvement measure and other optimization contents in Enlsited.
(Obviously, this does not include in the War Thunder infantry mode, where the soldier’s head view can rotate just like turning the turret.)
3
The War Thunder infantry mode claims that the time span will start from the Korean War and end at the current time threshold.
So in Enlisted, simply extending the Second World War, it would merely involve more new weapons, more new maps, and many game mechanics would no longer undergo significant or revolutionary changes and developments.
So, in about 3 to 5 years, or even 10 years from now, where will our game be headed and what will its future look like? How can we ensure the entry of new players and prevent the loss of existing players?
After all, in the War Thunder Infantry mode, most of the weapons and equipment as well as vehicles that enlisted personnel possess will be reused in the War Thunder Infantry mode.
PS: Personally, I speculate that the War Thunder infantry mode will start at the arcade mode 5.7BR for the land warfare BR, and the main battle tank category will begin with the T-34-85 (taking the Soviet and Chinese as an example).
In order to complete the final level (level 30) of the current season pass (bp) and post a message on the forum, I had to participate in two more battles again.
During these battles, a considerable number of players engaged in passive combat. They even used tanks to attack walls with no enemies, or shot at friendly troops on the frontline. They failed to clear the respawn points of their opponents and were not proactive in seizing strategic points.
Their gaming behavior does not conform to the normalized gaming behavior as stipulated by you.（@Lord_Sith）
They even did not kill the enemies but merely fed them, hindering their teammates.
For instance, they piloted planes to crash into the ground where their teammates were, and then let the flames ignite the soldiers of their teammates.
In addition, they use BR3 weapons and vehicles but do not take on more responsibilities and obligations. They still remain outside the strategic point range and engage in passive sniper attacks, allowing the strategic point to be occupied, and refusing to destroy or dismantle the opponent’s strategic point, even though some of the players among them have formed small teams.
Or they continue to manipulate the game situation by using aircraft to plunder a little bit of points, but at the same time they are striving to lead the game towards failure.
Of course, in order to ensure their winning rate and KD data, they would also engage in passive battles for a long time. After wasting a lot of manpower, they would then disconnect the connection before the battle ended.
On the battlefront, it was often just me alone. And no one supported/cover me.