Either we need a new tech tree apcs for br1 or we need to move unarmed br2 apcs to br1. we already have the armed universal carrier at br2 why have 2 different apcs in the same br.
ford mule
98 ho ki
Einheitsdiesel
Zis 42
Why not move armored APCs to BR3? Seems like a good compromise and doesn’t result with APCs at BR1. Add that as an option in the pole please.
I think opel blitz maultier would fit better with the other halftrucks
I ment add it to the pole up top.
Cant after 5 minutes change the poll
Id support unarmed APCs at BR I, some consider that OP.
But BR III we definitely need actual ARMOURED personnel carriers.
Allies should have tech tree M3 Halftrack and Universal Carrier, that should be non negotiable.
The Soviets can keep their Lend Lease premium because that allows people to use it with Soviet faction, that should NOT stop it being used by USA as their most common APC.
Likewise the Universal Carrier, it is what British/Commonwealth forces used so should be in the tech tree. There are multiple variants, both unarmed and armed, that are different to the event UCs. I have previously suggested the Canadian or Australian variants [the latter had a single fixed Vickers machine gun]
Germany should have the Sdkfz, surely there’s a version they can add that doesnt clash with the premium one.
Though I would remind players that the AS44-5 was a premium that was allowed in the Soviet tech tree so I dont see why a different camo, maybe different machine gun Sdkfz cant be added to TT [make it unarmed if its that important].
At the very least, the Jeeps should all have their squad sizes increased to a minimum of four, and they should be BR1, along with all of the Universal carriers. Or, if people can’t stomach BR1 Jeeps and Universal carriers at BR1 with MG’s, then simply have a separate version of them without MG’s at BR1. I never use the Universal Carriers because of their small crew size, and most likely won’t use the Jeeps for the same reason, but I would if they were at BR1.