That’s a pretty good reason to have these vehicles; the German APC, for instance, is quite hard to hide and maneuver, though having a fourth infantry squad is useful. These new vehicles would be a very convenient alternative, plus they give a purpose to this new update.
anti tank rifle = 30mm cannon ?
what are you smocking there.
i want some of it too
have you even looked up the difference with all the vehicles you listed?
or you just saw wheels hence they must be all the same? ![]()
the jeep is not better or worse than the 221.
it’s different.
each requires a different playstyle, but the role is kinda similar.
but both have cons and proes.
ok the jeep only has armored from the front
the gunner can still be stot from the front
the 221 only the gunner can be shot at all
the jeep is less accurate and slower reloading
except the 221 has only 2 crew.
and the gunner can be shot from the front.
the jeep has three
as can the jeeps gunner be shot from the front

Main
armament .303 in (7.7 mm) Bren light machine gun or a .55 in (13.9 mm) Boys Anti-tank Rifle[2]
This wouldn’t live long in BR3
ok jeep to br1 221 to br2
So what are you even asking ? That these 3 guys bring theyr moms too ?
I say no because it is an armored car. We might as well then say the Sd.Kfz 234s should be in this class
At appropriate BR why not ?
Throw it to 3 - 4
I would love to see a staghound ingame

sam br as 221 should be able to pen everything but the gun shield
I dream one day armored cars will be separated from tanks:
Now there is even unique resource for such vehicles will be shame not to have separation they don’t need to share the tank resource slots.
Youre comparing a tiny armored car with a 28mm gun to one with a 75mm

same br less armor, bigger , better turning gun
and the poster is comparing an uparmored jeep to an armored car
relatively crap AT rifle -/- arguably best AT rocket launcher of low BR.
Its almost like there is a clear tradeoff.
minus mg


