Move the Na-To tank destroyer to BR2 and change it's ammunition load to 20 APHE and 20 HE shells

The Na-To is a Japanese tank destroyer currently located on BR3, and it is the worst tank you can use in game the way it is now, and I say that with full confidence. This thing is a cannon on what was an APC, with incredibly thin armor in the places you do have it, an insane amount of open area that your crew can get shot from, casemate, no machine guns, and has the absolute worst ammo selection any vehicle has in game; out of all 40 shells you carry, only seven are high explosive, with the rest being split half and half with APHE and APCR (who is ever going to need that much AP ammunition anyways?), which makes your already weak anti-infantry capability nonexistent after you fire your first few shots. The one advantage that this gun did have over any other BR3 Japanese tank was the ability to penetrate Shermans consistently and other BR3, and some BR4 tanks (looking back on this, that is really depressing that Japan’s best BR3 tank had similar anti-tank capability than the Panzer 3J1), but the Chi-Nu II was lowered to BR3, which is a step up in every single regard; workable armor, not open topped, machine guns, a fully traversable turret, 35 of each shell type, of which are statistically the same as the Na-To’s shells.

So, with these facts laid out, I think that it is reasonable to ask for this tank destroyer to be moved to BR2 and have it’s ammunition load changed to 20 of each type of shell; this will let it be in a much better place and be a useful vehicle now and not a detriment to use, able to easily destroy BR3 tanks that downteir into BR2, without being too powerful for said BR with it’s many downsides still present.

Should the Na-To be moved to BR2?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
Should the Na-To’s ammunition be changed to 20 APHE and 20 HE shells?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
2 Likes

why are you voting on your own poll lol

1 Like

I’ve noticed that most people do.

But then, they don’t tend to make the results public. :slight_smile:

4 Likes

Is there any problem with that though? If I don’t, the results don’t include my opinion on the topic, and since there can’t be two posts on the same topic, this is my only way to give my opinion.

4 Likes

No issues at all. You’re free to make your polls however you want, so long as they adhere to the rules. :slight_smile:

4 Likes

no I just thought it was funny to see

2 Likes

How do you make them public again, I forgot

This is probably the healthiest spot for the Na-To. With its current ammo load out it deserves to be in BR1

2 Likes

When you are editing the poll, just add ‘public=true’ in the code section at the top like this:

Screenshot 2026-02-17 231609

I feel that it should never have exceeded BR1, and even then, nobody would use it. A tank’s gun doesn’t justify its performance. So yes, im agree

2 Likes

Everyone does this, as far as I know… Me included.

I want my vote to be counted, don’t I? Why suggest it and not vote on the thing I want to change

2 Likes

Naturally… making the topic shows you want it in the game.

With ones with multiple options i personally can understand however to me it looks like you’re trying to skew the vote otherwise but what doe i know.

Skew the vote? By having my vote be counted?