Moscow. Are there still those who believe that the Red Army Air Force needs improvement?


I just heard some players crying that the Soviets have weak bombs and that the Luftwaffe is much better in Moscow… :slightly_smiling_face:

2 Likes

must have been on the russian forum. dont think i have seen anyone say that here in a while

1 Like

Still, some ppl here believe Moscow is balanced and axis got much, much better planes here (cause one stuka got one 500kg bomb).

So what he says is not too far fetched.

Moscow simply isn’t worth playing. Unless someone likes relaxing pve while playing Soviet.

1 Like

You are probably right that people think that way, and its a really dumb opinion. But i havent seen anyone express that opinion on the English forum lately though.

(Partially because the forum is more dead than a pre buff flamer in a building, but still)

and the bf110c-7, and the starting stuka. their fighters are also more useful than soviet counterparts as well as

well it’s true, but it’s literally the only advantage axis have.

1 Like

I love the moscow-russian I-153 M-62, its my favorite plane in the game for me so far with how fun and good it is.

See what I mean?:

Ricky is one of those thinking Moscow is perfectly fine as is, balanced, even.

So yeah. There’s those in English forum as well.

1 Like

schmetter once told me that equipment does not matter that much, it’s skill that matters the most in this game and he is right because you can have the best equipment in the game but doesn’t mean shit if you aren’t good at the game while you can do amazing work with bad equipment if you are good enough

1 Like

yes i see. i never denied they exist here. i was replying to this here

specifically the just heard part :sunglasses:

1 Like

Plane are not always belanced in enlisted? Because all plane are heavly modified from their warthunder brother for work in enlisted and they end have similiar performance, if we have the orginal warthunder plane i can say soviet plane are fucking good, but for now i dont se difference betwen a BF-109 and a yak1 here, expecially after the last update wo add better damage model for plane

2 Likes

Fully agreed.

But the player base disagrees with you. It’s why axis side is mostly empty, in Moscow.

The fact I CAN kill a ppsh41 wielding guy with a mp28 does not makes it balanced. Like the beretta 20 bullets vs ppsh41. Sure it’s possible to kill ppsh41 players with it, no problem. But I guarantee you it’s MUCH easier wielding the ppsh…

Moscow is a meme, now. Even Soviets main complain it’s extremely boring because they have rarely any human adversaries to fight anymore.

3 Likes

player base issue is what i am fully aware and plagues any and all campaigns, like tunisia axis for example because it’s equipment isn’t bad, not by a long shot, instead it was just boring as we had almost all of those weapons before in other campaigns so no one played it. something similar happened in normandy where in CBT you would frequential have close matches while in OBT start- October it was axis getting curbstomped repeatable as rumors of allies being OP spreaded and new players flooded to the axis on normandy.

1 Like

Since it’s the only campaign I m not maxed out. I m like level 25 or so, any thing that give me multi kills for low effort and therefore more xp, is a plus on my books. As I m trying to speed run this shit so I never play it again.

So nah, soviet Cas in Moscow is fine as is.

Multiple bombs plus rockets and decent MG against stuckas

What more one need.

Tbh, out of all alied campaign I m just interested in both t28’s.

Nothing more, nothing less. Kinda dull campaign for me

1 Like

The t28 is a “one of a kind” vehicle in Enlisted. Probably the best anti infantry tank there is, I love the separate mg turrets mechanics. It’s really fun to use on bots (it’s all what’s remaining of axis)

Makes me hope one day of functional hull mgs for other vehicles.

I remember I used to try persuading you into joining Moscow a lot, before when it was fun and there was still a bit of balance remaining… You proved to be the one who’s right: Moscow is dull, now. It’s just pve
:pensive:

Yeah I had everything maxed including axis Moscow for months.

Moscow don’t offer me nothing interesting berlin (vehicles and cqb weapons I play with) or even Stalingrad now (bolt action and tanks)
The more Moscow alies goes the less sence it makes to play. Since Stalingrad offers more for less time cost.

You don’t even know the pain I feel everytime I play it. It’s just so fking boring.
Mostly because of the maps, I just like 1 of it and it’s a conquest map (where B is inside a church).

I just want to finish it and will probably do next 2 or 3 weeks just for the sake of “i have everything done”, I can now chill on my tiger 2 in custom matches inflating my berlin axis win rate.

Tbh, it’s just another campaign I ill try to speedrun and just do 1-2 levels per update in 1 day and. Never. To be touched again.

1 Like

That map still exists??? The Church in the middle of a river fork? I hadn’t see it in months :no_mouth: (and never will, I won’t even grind the new lvls added in Moscow)

Yeah, I did play It few times recently. It’s a beautiful map where a invasion could really fit perfectly.

It’s a map where house to vegetation ratio is on point, and isn’t like a baloe lake or what ever is called that’s fucking painful to even play on.

3 Likes

Hopefully we see kamenka river invasion someday.

It might be best conquest in whole game

1 Like

I keep hearing people say that but I play Tunisia every single day and when I play it there’s always human players on my team, and I play Axis, Presumably there is a list someplace where they keep track of all of this stuff right but is it general knowledge can the public see what the actual numbers are?

1 Like