More long range AT capabilities?

Well 75mm vs 76mm seems pretty fair. If 85mm is added then flak 88 needs to be usable

Also Berlin weak guns could just be the pak 38 and AT 45mm

the russian 85 is roughly as good as the german 75(from pz 4s, not panthers)-pen and HE wise
the 76 is closer to the 50 mm- pen wise, 76 mm has better HE

The starting tank is the PZ IV so 76mm wont be terrible, also benefit is better HE at cost of AP. Idk, Russia in Berlin seems boring to me having to use German equipment because “capture” it erodes the uniqueness they have.

the problem is that the 76 cant pen panthers, tigers from the front making it kinda useless at being a stationary AT gun, the 85 can at least pen its weakspots
the german 75 can pen anything it would realistically face from the front

85 vs 75 would be fair matchup as they can both pen the enemy by aiming for weakspots

Dedicated mid campaign Pak 43 and 17 pounder AT squads with proper gunner optics. For early war campaigns add Pak 40 and QF 6 pounder as end of campaign unlock.

Proper gunner optics are a must! That’s in addition to that current commander view.

Concepts:

  • ability to build gun like Engineer.
  • ability to slowly move the deployed gun
  • ability to build ammo crate that resupplies the AT gun.
  • ability to break down the gun and relocate like Engineer does with current AT.

Again Gunner optics are a must!