More BRs for game balance

A few players complain about BR 5 being too overpowered especially since they can fight BR3, so I propose a BR6 to put some current BR 5 stuff in.


Here’s what will go to this new BR6:

  • Strong vehicles such as King Tigers and Super Pershings
  • Select fire rifles such as T20s and Type Hei Autos
  • Assault rifles

Here’s what will stay/go in BR5:

  • Relatively strong vehicles such as M4A2 76 (W)s and Panthers
  • 20 round semi autos, such as SVT-40 with Bubnov drum
  • High capacity SMGs (60+ rounds)

Unless double up-tiers are removed from the game, I will support more BRs for game balance.

8 Likes

More BRs are pointless, we need more queues.

As long as there’s not -/+ 0 MM, adding more BRs is literally counterproductive.

12 Likes

Fair enough. I just really hate being matched up against BR5

2 Likes

Agree, semis+smgs should be separated from SF rifles and ARs.
However most powerful smgs like Thompson 100 (both Soviet + USA) and Conders should be placed at BR6.

2 Likes

should be less BR

BR1 for noobies
BR2 for normal
BR3 for pros.

less BR
more playerbase meeting in battles.

That’s basically what we have now.

The problem is that content is not balanced towards 3 BRs. But is is balanced towards 5 BRs while we actually have only 3 queues. (4 with current hard rule for BR1).

This creates only completely nonsensical imbalances. Especially for BR4.

There’s basically no reason to play BR4 lineup unless you want to be willingly in disadvantage.
Or you can keep deserting until you end up in BR3-4 match thanks to the soft rule. But in the case you will end up having pretty decent advantage, especially on the vehicle side of things.

This game could easily do well with only 4 BRs and -/+ 0 MM.

3 Likes

you are all too focused on weapons
when is the number of rally points what wins the match.

Can’t have rally points if the beginning players are not taught how to build them in a tutorial. I’m sorry but a splash screen with a word wall is no way to teach players how to use new classes. If there was an active tutorial that brings the player into the test range to show the new abilities more people would build rallies, ammo depots, Mark things, etc.

So yes, weapons and vehicles are the balance points at the moment because lazy devs are lazy with showing the player base how to do things.

Totally useless.

The game is losing more and more players for various reasons.

We don’t need new BRs. We need more players, as well as more balanced games.

A large part of BR3 players just want to crush BR2 players and don’t want to bear the fact that they will be crushed by BR5. This is a manifestation of selfishness and immaturity. When I was playing BR2 and saw those damn Sherman tanks, T34, and Panzer IV tanks madly throwing HE spam at me, I knew that it was time to have a BR5 battle to teach these bastards a little lesson.

And jets :dromedary_camel: :dromedary_camel: :dromedary_camel:

1 Like

If faction is shit, nobody will play them. And if no one plays them, no one can even technically build rallies.
Was the case with old order like Tunisia Axis or Berlin Allies.

1 Like

BR6 is a dumb idea, it will solve none of the existing problems but will make Japan TT even worse.

i dont see shit factions
all of them have material to win battles.
bolties,semiautos,smgs and machine guns.
all of them have them

I mean sure now there is less faction struggle beyond ocassional update shifts.
But

Its is not always the same just because it has same category.
Pretty sure 20rd Beretta vs. PPSh or M2 vs. Japanese Garand wasnt fun either.

1 Like

everything can be neutralized with a boltie.
or a grenade
or a well placed rally. :relieved:

I’m not sure DF needs a BR6 if they would just “KEEP BR3 OUT OF BR5” matches. I don’t ever see DF going to a true 0/0 BR rating, but if they would just stick to their 1/1 making that the PERMANANT rule for all factions that would end a lot of frustration from people who want to play BR3 Japanese/Allies but get punked into a BR5. If I had my way, I would make BR5 a stand alone battle rating. 1-2, 3-4 and 5. Not enough players? BS. I’m sure some people desert as soon as they find that their level 3 squads are in a level 5 match.

Or we can just remove BR all together and find a better solution

2 Likes

Such as?

1 Like

You could balance quantity vs quality.
Problem is, this would probably require to redesign entire game from ground up. So there is no chance.