SVT, Gewerh 43 and Garand all have 15.3 damage fully upgraded which is enough to kill anyone in one shot even with vitality.
I’m talking about within 100 meters or maybe even 200.
And so far the Soviets are only benefiting from that damage with the AVS you’d be lucky if you survive getting shot by that rifle.
And what about the ZH-29 ? This weapon has exactly the same damage as the AVS as they both have 13 damage at 100 m, which is not enough to kill someone with vitality in one shot btw.
No western allies weapons match the damage of ZH and AVS.
Yes that’s true but that’s an automatic not a semi automatic it fires faster and can put down more bullets down the line and suppress you and Some more variety of weapons would help instead of just relying on ZH-29.
German main are always complaining about soviet weapons anyway. That does not change the fact that the western allies don’t have any weapon that matches ZH-29 damage and I never saw anyone complaining.
That’s because ZH-29 doesn’t have as much murder potential as the AVS And that’s still an auto weapon unlike ZH-29.
Just quoting yourself when I was discussing the M2 carbine, thus why are you complaining about the AVS 36 if it is an automatic weapon that does not fit in the semi-auto category?
Because I want a reliable semi automatic unless I go to the automatic category and start using MKB or KIRALY.
You will have to wait for the merge and (maybe) a good MM and battle rating system for that. I always found the Garand consistent in Normandy though, even against spam of STG and FG.
1 Like
True but when it comes to end game it’s not always gonna be automatic to decide who wins the battle it’s who can shoot more precisely And if there’s not too much dispersion magic going on.
what if they were based off caliber? thatd be crazy… or accurate