Map Veto when there are over 100 maps

Not only we will not get map veto with merge, even if it’s get added it’s gonna be like 2-4 maps (+2 with premium)

Now there are way over 5 maps with broken balance in just one campaing - looking at You lazy East/West/North/South versions of map that have points just reordered with no thought about balance - somebody did that shit in 2 min and propably didn’t even play it once to see how it affects the game.

Add to that train map, which are instant veto, assault maps on offence - which are so unbalanced it’s not even funny.

We would need 10 maps veto to just ban single conquest map we don’t want to play.

Maps need to be rebalanced - greyzones are all over the place, same with spawn points, no timeout on inasion points when spawn move after 10 seconds but paras land on next one instantly, some East/West/North/South versions of map should go straight to garbage disposal.

We will have more players per match after merge, but desertion will get worse real fast.

And harsher penalties will just make players quit game entirely and not few matches.
/rant over, fix maps already

this would be best implemented by veto vote. you preselect maps/modes that you dont want to play and when MM creates match and gets all votes from players you play least hated mode/map.

There are a lot or variant but the map are just 7

If veto works in maps in general, it would be still suck.

Ban train - 2 maps - 1 veto
Ban assault - too many maps

Still half maps have broken greyzones that get abused by paras