Quite sure theres plenty games that doesnt have such mechanics. Which is why I always keep wondering why the fk people end up in this game if it bothers them so much.
Also you can still bunnyhop in enlisted, you can even get perks to do it more effectively.
Yeah, not going to happen in HNG especiatly these days as theres just seasoned players left.
Against total noobs that doesnt even defend the spots in first place, sure then it works.
And due to map design it aint going to happen like in enlisted.
You seem to wave your flag for realism while asking for 1:1 balance, which hardly is realistic in any combat ever fought on this planet. Quite ironic.
Yeah totally realistic.
Perhaps you should search āDetpackā at forums.
Yeah, cant blame the team that allows spawn campping to happen.
Its by far more realistic to have a greyzone where enemy cannot go.
No instead they made safespace for brainless monkeys to sit in safety of greyzone with theyr tanks.
Which is again, totally realistic.
In maps these small, having 2 tanks / 2 planes constantly is pretty much constant spam.
So did HNG, which pretty much lead to its death.
Well actually soviets especiatly learned hard way why tanks require infantry with them.
So it actually did happen, tanks rolling without infantry cover.
Not sure what you are after here ? Is your argument that planes require infantry cover in order to do theyr job ?
I dont recall there was much of infantry covering planes during strategic bombings or during battle of britain especiatly in air warfare.
But you already seem to know so much about history / realism that I dont see reason to question your argument here.
Perhaps paratroopers were founded to defend bomber planes in mid-air ?
Yeah, pardon me. After reading your arguments again, greyzones & limited spawns definitely makes sense especiatly if weāre talking of realism / representing WW2.
Yea, sorry. 1:1 balance with pampering greyzones does indeed represent WW2 alot better than HNG.