—> people buy more prem. squads and grind more events & are happy to get their swag
since these squads are basically always weaker than optimized normal tech tree squads, there is no balance issue with that.
3 Likes
Is this serious suggestion?
1 Like
Use assaulters?
Soldier classes exist for a reason ffs.
5 Likes
P2W 
I bought all of my premiums because I liked the weapons/uniform not to gain an unfair advantage over other people.
3 Likes
Are you aware of the fact that high number of premium/event engineers already do have full auto weapon?
Just buy a squad depending on what weapon you prefer.
2 Likes
L take Paradivision
1 Like
obv a bait.
More P2W great… Already paratroopers are the op troops in enlisted where you can just easily drop on objective very easily by choosing to drop on it with a total of 200 round gun… Churchill 3 is hell to deal with as a german secondary player because of its tough armor… Pretty sad that germany player overall are just punching bags for allies and soviets because even their tanks are shit as opposed to popular media. Look at T-60 vs Pz-II c, literally the rounds ricochet ;-;
1 Like
Can we just stop turning every goddamn soldier to an assaulter pls ?
3 Likes
Bad idea. Engineers in premium and event squads are already better than engineers in normal squads.
1 Like
this whole p2w whining became a joke at this point.
i tried a couple of premium squads since beginning of this year, and even despite picking only really good ones i noticed, that normal squads are stronger than premium/event squads 99% of the time.
people who constantly claim “prem squads are unfair, muh p2w” are apparently to bad at this game to properly evaluate power levels. i rarely use premium squads for fun and in serious games i only use my self made squads. DF doesnt understand much well, but they are very good at ensuring the game doesnt turn into p2w and stays a p2-grind-faster game, which is how they want this game to be positioned against its competitors.
for those here who need to be directly pointed at a direction to grasp a concept: making 1 engineer in every prem/event squad an assault engineer will not make them too strong, it will lift them from too weak to at least less weak
and obviously assault engineers only have relevance in br5 (which is something many people didnt understand after reading my post), which is the BR where normal tech tree unlocks become so OP that engineer squads with fun gimmicks become completely useless, so the assault engineer advantage becomes desperately needed.
low br “assault rifles” have no relevance in this context, as their power level is a joke, so they dont disrupt balance.
1 Like
Agreed. Bolt guns are far superior in damage but they can’t compete with every SMG in low or high BR.
Well its not unless you have the churchill 3 and Paratroopers that just spawn on objective, killing and wiping people easily. Churchill 3 is just hard to penetrate and throw tnt on to except the top.
As you already know, engineers are op themselves by building HMG, LMG, and anti vehicle guns along with other fortifications. So adding assault rifles will make them more over powered. DF is just right on engineer and no need assault engineers. Semi auto rifles are just great because they fire faster than bolt actions and deal around same type of 1 shot capability.