dude i get you
look at ts
i sometimes stack with like one or 2 other guys but it gets to a point where its cringe
look at ts
I mean i get it. This is most likely happened because small diameter solid AP shots are absolutely horrendous at killing tanks in Enlisted unless it hits ammo rack as it lacks post pen damage along with APCR, and Panzer 3 N actually happen to have pretty good internal module layouts unlike Panzer 4 which ammo racks all over the place.
I shall endeavor to be the bigger man and respond to this comment in a civilised manner, I was quite tempted to write what I will admit was a somewhat incensed response which would had not been productive.
Firstly, I was not trying to say that I only shot at the Pz 3N’s UFP whenever I had engaged that tank back in the old days, though I will take the idea that I could always perfect land every shot in that specific area even at long ranges as a complement. Perhaps my off-handed commenet about its spaced armour implied that, if so that was not my intention.
Secondly, even if that above claim about only shooting the 3N in the hull was true, it does not change my point. The 6 pounder gun has relatively good penetration, even in War Thunder (which from what I have heard portrays that cannon in a rather unsympathetic manner) it has over 100mm of penetration. This is far beyond what the 3N’s hull armour should be able to reasonably resist without very heavy angling even with the addition of its spaced armour.
“If this proposal had been submitted in the past, I would have supported it. However, from the current perspective, this proposal seems problematic. This is because vehicles capable of using large-caliber high-explosive shells already exist in other countries as well. It would be better to provide large-caliber vehicles to Germany instead.”
The problem isnt exactly the large caliber shell rather the combination of insane armor & capability to spam those large caliber shells.
Far as I know, neither JP or GE has anything comparable.
Soviets are obvious exception due to being the wheelchair assist faction that gets special treatment in every turn.
But murrica doesnt fight them.
1 Like
In that case, it would be better to nerf the M4A3 vehicle to BR 4 and add a suitable vehicle to BR 3.
For example, the M7 self-propelled howitzer would be a good choice.
quite sure there is suitable shermans at BR3 the 105mm just isnt one of them.
“Hmm? Why not? Is there any reason it wouldn’t work? BR 3 already has plenty of vehicles equipped with 152mm, 150mm, 122mm, and 120mm main guns. I think a 105mm self-propelled howitzer with thin armor and no roof armor would be perfectly fine to have at BR 3. At least it’s better than the M4A3, isn’t it?”
Sure as event like sturm.
Have you tried using planes? Or asking ur teammates to use a plane to bomb a tank?
have you ever even played the game ?
if you are gonna look at tanks to uptier, 105 sherman is only on 8th position(cause of 2 extra KV1)
before moving 105 sherman, you first need to move KV1 to BR4, pz3 N stalingrad to BR3, both KV2 to BR4, ho-i to BR3, chi-ha to BR4 and then only we get to 105mm sherman. also cause of similar performance, we should also move t34, sherman and pz4 E to higher tiers
KT to BR 2 then just go bomb… What a great logic…
Maybe you should apply at gaijin for their WT balancing department.
There you can see how beloved the “spreadsheet says Xyz is fun” mentality is.
Repair prices where based on vehicle perfomance in the past which meant for some rare vehicles only a select few amount of players could afford to use it without going bankrupt. As a result only the best players where playing such vehicles which in turn only made the reenforced the same issue.
Meanwhile vehicles that were appealing to the masses had plently of kinda trash players dilluting the statistics. As a result the rare overtiered vehicle was by that metric more powerfull (and thuse more picey) than the actual best in slot vehicles at the same BR.
Event the data set has some glaring indicators that the data is very unreliable since
BP Kv is somehow noticably stronger than TT KV1
but the most blatant indicator that your data is flawed is the fact that the BP Ho-I is somehow number 7 but the TT Ho-I is not even in the top 16.
And well the Chi ha with its 57mm gun beeing OP is also very funny as it really is not with just 55mm of pen.
So if you want to compare rare event and premium tanks with TT tank without accounting for this kind of bias then you really only demonsrate the issue of relying on numbers without actually understanding what they mean.
it becomes obvious when you actually think about it. who has BP KV and who has regular TT KV? BP/premium/event are usually bought or earned by players who invest more time in game and thus are more skilled than f2p casual players who dont have them.
my whole argument is if OP is relying on same stats to show that 105mm sherman is OP, then that same table is showing 8 other tanks that are more OP than 105mm sherman and should be moved a tier up. #equalityforall
Sounds like you have a skill issue
90% of playerbase has skill issue…
1 Like
It is a great logic. If cant win face to face, snipe it if not, flank it, if not, attack from rear, if not, attack from above,if not,.that’s your problem
so i take that as no.
Except the F2p player cant magically make tanks fly or switch them to planes.
Got any other good ideas that absolutely no one else figured out ?
1 Like
Nothing Much. Its just feel bad for the US mains if this happens
2 Likes