Anime so good, they named a year after it.
6 Likes
The introduction of the Mosin-Nagant pistol was for the sake of concealed carrying? Actually, it was to address the shortage of pistols among Red Army soldiers. For a while, it was popular to saw off the Mosin-Nagant rifle and use it as a pistol. Here’s a joke: this Mosin-Nagant is the fastest to reload.
1 Like
What do you mean by disliking Japan? Are you kidding? Japan’s BR5 vehicles are now very strong. The BR3 Garand copy, after being strengthened to semi-automatic, is only second to the SVT38. What else do you want? Haven’t you noticed the strength brought by the Japanese Tiger, the 800kg load change, and so on? Japan is a major shareholder in the game! What are you confusing right and wrong for?
I think a lot of people in the forum are just fools who have been ruined by the so-called “happy education” and can’t do simple math. They can’t even figure out that 5 is less than 6. Losing one person is a huge problem for them. They even use the excuse that one submachine gun is equivalent to two people.
1 Like
Let’s not go down that road…
1 Like
This isn’t about catering to the Chinese market, is it? China’s contributions during World War II have never been fully explored. Now it’s the Chinese New Year, so what’s wrong with having some good activities? This is also beneficial to the Soviet Union. You have Christmas and marathons, so why can’t we have a festival? Without China, who would celebrate this New Year? Japan or South Korea? This isn’t Tencent trying to flatter someone. Why don’t you say that in recent years, strengthening Japan to make it stronger than history isn’t flattery?Oh, oh, the logic of World War II, hahaha, ridiculous. Not to mention which major country broke the peace first, the Chinese team’s entry into the war made them angry. Do they really think that 80% of Japan’s troops were held up there?
3 Likes
You’re right, that’s a bit biased. It’s a direct attack. But those on the forum who calculate the number of Chinese teams and say things like 5 is greater than 6, and those who claim that Chinese teams coming to the World War II game are sycophantic and distort history, I can’t just sit by and watch. If anyone gets upset, they can take it as a personal attack. If a stone hits a dog, it barks. There are many people on the forum who treat the German Nazis as their father and are eager to learn German. I won’t say who they are. Those who aren’t mentioned won’t get angry. I’ll find evidence to prove it and show up every day to make my point.
1 Like
Seizing weapons is fine, and perhaps creating a small squad of Chinese puppet troops could also work. But no matter what, one must first have Chinese guns before there can be seized Chinese guns. The sequence of events must be clear. How could someone else’s be more significant than one’s own? Then I could say that the US seizing Tiger II tanks is even more meaningful.
1 Like
Thank you for the event, great weapons, squads and the new decorations — it’s more than good enough!
One thing I’d like to mention, maybe others experience it too: I play on Xbox Series X and very often when I’m crouching at a window my weapon keeps disappearing and reappearing over and over again, which is really annoying.
The other issue is that lately it happens quite a lot that the weapon just stops and won’t reload, then after a few seconds when it shows 0 ammo, it suddenly jumps back to 10–25 rounds.
I don’t know if others have the same problem, but there are moments when this stutter is very frustrating — unless it’s meant to simulate the old times when weapons jammed because of overheating, etc., although as far as I know that’s not actually a mechanic in the game. 
THANKS!
No-one is suggesting that the Chinese weren’t a part of the catastrophic events of WWII, nor are anybody suggesting that they shouldn’t be represented. The Chinese people suffered greatly, it’s well known and documented. You’re the one suggesting terms like “sycophantic” and “distort history”.
I’m all for new events, and repeating events such as the Lunar New Year. But this is the Internet, you’re always going to get one or two making out like that the Chinese don’t exist in other continents other than East Asia. And unless they break a forum rule, they’re entitled to their opinion. It’s best not to get so riled up and take it personally. If someone posts something that is racist, or xenophobic, then rest assured, we will deal with it.
You’re taking this from a simple “can one squad have more?” suggestion to a more personal, and potentially political affront to your country, which isn’t the case at all.
That is simply not true, and to some, offensive. Best not to go down that route.
I’m now in a position where I have to insist that we divert from this rhetoric, and suggest that we keep the thread on topic. Any further diversions to this thread will be removed. Political or otherwise.
3 Likes
Only 1 squad?
Lame.
2 Likes
indeed
So could you please tell me why three Chinese assaulter squads,( one USA and two USSR) are all 5 members, instead of 6 members, since most event or gold squads are 6 members. Don’t ignore me dear Moderator.
1 Like
Not my decision, so I don’t know what you want me to say.
1 Like
Thank you for not ignoring me. And you said that you didn’t make the decision, so if players making suggestion on the forum, will you send these suggestions to decisionmaker?
If users make appropriate suggestions in the appropriate category, then our esteemed helpers will forward them on if they get enough attention. The News thread isn’t the place to make suggestions. We have a specific forum category for that.
My job is to keep the peace around here. That’s all.
1 Like
Ok thank you bro for your patience
2 Likes
AT gunner with smg, but the whole squad would loss 1 rifle and 1 man comparing to gold and event squads (many examples). The squads would get much faster wiped out. But what benefit can I get if I have a AT gunner with smg? I get nothing, but I lose one guy and one rifle actually. There are many example of 5 mg/smg and one rifle squad, why couldn’t Chinese squad also be 5smg and 1rifle? Make a simple calculation you could find that, AT gunner with smg is not a trade off, it’s actually making Chinese squad weaker since one solider and one rifle is canceled.
You’re right, I was indeed angry. I was quite happy at first, but then I saw that the two new teams only had five members. After that, I noticed that the data of the paid guns was worse than those of the previous teams from other countries. Finally, I saw some angry comments under this post. I wasn’t the first one to raise the issue of distorting history and flattering China. If you look at the previous messages again, there are still some, although few, but they are as glaring and uncomfortable as blue in red. The key is that there are actually quite a few people who agree with them. So I got angry and I had to fight back. Chinese people don’t come here anymore because the forum is full of people pretending not to know. I’m saying all this just to refute. If I said something unreasonable, it wasn’t aimed at anyone specifically. Only those who think they are like that will be hit where it hurts. Otherwise, why be so anxious. Some people’s daily words and deeds have already been exposed. I’m angry because the Chinese team should have been there. Other countries have had similar problems with historical maps. Now they are picking on China. I can’t just sit and wait to be attacked. You are a competent person, but next time, also take a look at my other sharp comments before. I’ve already toned it down because sharp comments will only circulate among Chinese people and eventually form a stereotype of Western arrogance, deepening the gap between the two sides. Of course, it’s not ruled out that there are still some people in DF who have deviated from their stance.
6 Likes