Really and what Japan has better tanks? ground attackers ? planes ? LMGs?
Only the SMGs and maybe semi autos are better then Germany. But with Germany you can play BR I or BR III. But even BR II is better then Japan BR II.
The type 38 rifle is great, the br2 AT weapons is leagues better than the German’s AT pistol, the ho-i is great, the br3 lmgs currently are good enough since they only face the USA (the Manchuria update needs to bring a large capacity lmg to both USA and Japan br3).
Its ok rifle for BR I. But at BR II Germany have a lot better options and Japan also have semi autos.
Why do you use the pistol GrB-39 has a lot of ammo and its amazing. However requires skill but when it comes to range its not bad only KVs are the problem.
Ho-I is like the only option but Germany has Puma in BR II you have PZ IV that is very similar to Ho-I and Marder III super distinct vehicles. Japan literally has Ho-I.
Then wen it comes to Ground attackers all the Japanese ground attackers are trash and the BR I BF is better then the Zero. Then you have IAR -81C. So Germany as you can see its very strong in BR II compared to Japan. But yeah even Germany is weak against BR II US or USSR since they have strong tanks and strong air force and amazing SMGs. But you can just copy this BR I build its the best BR I build in the game and you are not facing KVs or Shermans at BR III:
So as you can see early BR Germany is miles better then early BR Japan.
I cant figure out how to use the range on the Grb 
, its also not assigned on the controller by default so it makes it tricky to adjust the in game rangefinder. Not to mention I can run with the sturm pistol.
hopefully the Manchuria update will be more Japan focused, so holes in the tech tree can be filled.
the Grb is hard to master but if you do you can kill a lot of stuff first I hated this weapon so much now I cant imagine not using it xD Absolutely unique anti tank weapon.
It wont the devs are giving us some strange things like the Ki-83 that fixed some problems since its miles better then other Japanese ground attackers but its not a ground attacker and BR IV is non existent BR for Japan and leaves Japan just a BR V faction and no one likes to play BR V Japan since its full of fantasy stuff its fun for 2 3 games but BR III ,BR II and BR I are the most important BR and there is no vehicles there … all I need is Stuka with the siren in BR I and im not moving from Germany BR I xD
1 Like
no
8mm Nambu
7.62 Tokarev
8mm Nambu is knowed as lack of power
Nambu is half that of the 9×19mm, and less than half of the 7.62×25mm Tokarev,[11] and it is often regarded as lacking in stopping power.
From wikipedia
1 Like
Nice graph
Maybe 9mm kill more is because its holding rate is higher 
9mm is .35inch
Why .45 and .40 kill less than 9mm huh
Maybe 9mm has more kills because it’s the most common handgun catridge. Also it doesn’t take into account how many rounds were fired.
1 Like
Well, thats correct. But thats not the point here.
Yes thats correct, there are graphs more accurate than this, though they generally show the same results.
I only picked this because it’s easy to read and can easily be copied too.
The yellow represent the non-fatal incidents (victim didnt die) and the red represent the fatal ones, the yellow and the red together represent the total number of incidents.
Indeed its correct that 9mm is the most common, but that doesn’t make it the most lethal on the list, which are actually the 10mm and 7.62x39, both at 100% lethality rate (the sample size is small though).
Because they are less common, however.45 acp obviously more lethal than 9mm while .40 did marginally worse probably due to factors not represented such as: number of shots, area hit ect.
Cuz you are confusing stopping power vs lethality. The higher caliber has higher chance getting out of your body while smaller caliber has higher chance staying in your body. A high-speed bullet causes a “wake” or “shockwave” in the body’s soft tissues, creating a temporary cavity that is larger than the physical size of the bullet itself. So its not magic formula all bullets are deadly simply some will kill you on spot other can cause more damage to your body really depends on the case. In General higher caliber causes more damage but there is more factors type of bullet , type of gun the material of the bullet that is made. Short story all bullets are deadly but 8mm Nambu should be worse then 7.62 tokarev however enlisted cant do guns right it often makes guns with higher rate of fire better and the bullet damage is all over the place there is no standard damage for bullet caliber (not that this is right since the damage cant be determent only by the caliber).
But yes in game .45 ACP are kind of strongly explained when they disappear mid air while you are killed by faster 9 mm bullets xD 9mm bullets are lighter, so they are propelled at a higher muzzle velocity.
There is simply too many factors.