if before was terrible, now it’s no near to be better.
is it just me, or devs are giving us hints on AVOID compleatly this weapon?
i’m not kidding. this gun was really bad, and now, it’s even worse.
w h y ?
i don’t get it. you need around 3 to 4, and sometives even 5 to 6 ( if vitality perk ) just to kill a single dude?
due to it’s low damage, had to conpensate with rate of fire. but now, it’s a different story.
i’ll never know 
i wonder which stats they are looking at.
I wiew it glady i have full garand now but staying on the subject there shouldn’t be the m1 and m2 rifles either so pretend it didn’t exist helps
that’s not the the point.
the gun was bad from the start. now it’s even worse.
ree
M1 Carabine
i hate it before the nerf.
and many more will hate it now.
it’s somewhat similar to the Vg 1 - 5 situations.
where it keeps getting nerfs for no reason on earth.
I like here for the design but yes like wapons sucks
Atleast vg is really good gun.
Was*
yet another iconic gun that will be never seen again on the battlefield, instead we will see ppl running around with prototypes and elite guns.
That crappy weapon almost nobody ever use received yet another nerf? What was it this time? I must have missed it…
in the newer update.
basically looses it’s Rate Of Fire that was possible to be gained at level 2 ( more chances from rng as well ) and it even gets a reduction of damage…
yikes.
Oh, for the m1 carbine yes (I find that nerf very weird and… not useful?)
But the VG 1-5 was nerfed in rof as well? 
which let’s be honest, the " high " rate of fire was the only way to somewhat compensate with the huge backdraws that the entire weapon had… now, gone.
Why should it does more damage than 7.92 Kurz which has 1900 muzzle energy when upgraded? It’s just not realistic at all. Nice fix.
Super weird. Nerfing a weapon that pre nerf already was so bad that I have shot 2 clips in practice with it and it never reached the field on my part. Would love to understand the reasoning
confused to why they did that why and not the other way, i’m still going to use it though because both versions have lower recoil than garand
man, at this point, the devs might as well consider giving the US the m1 carbine as a starting weapon instead of the springfield. would make more sense since the US relied 90% on semi auto guns.
The M1 is so bad, it would get switched out as soon as you get something better.
Sometimes I have a feeling that somewhere there is one separated server where bunch of people do crazy things in coordination, like being afk in a plane or using M2 carabine to slaughter the enemy that allows this. And all this only to provide false data for devs that are used to balance the game.
Maybe that’s what happened to asia server?
because you should know already by now that damage is not based around catridges?
it’s not a fix at all since legitmally a pistol deals more damage and is more reliable than a carbine.
i don’t know if you ever touched the americans, but this feels rather like the Vg 1 - 5 nerf.
was it justfied?
did anyone asked for nerfs?
no, and no.
( i mean, in the alpha, some people said that it was too much powerfull but, eh… )
and with the m1 is no different.