Longer wait times in exchange for more balanced matches

Archive Suggestions - Archive
1

At least in my experience playing Americans BR 2-3, the most I wait for a match is a minute and a half, usually its around a minute. But then I get placed into a one-sided match, usually the Americans rolling the other team, sometimes we get rolled, RARELY a remotely even match up.

IMO It gets pretty boring and repetitive when there is one side clearly superior in 95% of the matches. I would much rather wait 2-3, hell even 5 minutes for a match that’s a lot more even, where both sides are actually competing for victory.

What are everyone else’s thoughts on this?

4 Likes
2

For reference this match is average. Does this seem fun? Because its not to be

image
image1920×1080 122 KB

3

I drop matches far more than i did before the merge so i would wait longer if it improved my odds

1 Like
4

That’s the Japs. It’s universally agreed the Japs have it the worst out of all the groups. Try playing D-Day when half your team DC’s in the first minute

5

Yes, longer wait times need to happen for better match making. It has to happen!