Funny enough, I actually did see him. There was also another guy named something about always losing. Might I ask if you have recognized me? I didn’t play all weekend but I was in matches on friday. lol
1 Like
No idea if I saw you or not. I think Friday night I played a bunch of pacific games because it seems the weebs are the only ones with day jobs or school somehow. I’m usually in BR1-2 bracket.
1 Like
Different server probably
1 Like
Reality is there’s a couple people who didn’t like the merge in the minority trolling the forums with fake accounts. Hamster is clearly one of those accounts so I treat him like the sweaty bot he is.
4 Likes
Yea I was somewhat against merge cause I like the campaign system but eh I don’t have any solution I can think of personally
2 Likes
It is not sustainable to pick exactly which campaign you want, the player base will be split further when new campaign is added.
Lol tech tree tank will also meet tiger II so using your logic people won’t use tech tree tank. Besides that, many people buy gold tank because they want to use unique tank.
Historical unit are nothing but skin, since they can equip weapon that the unit don’t use.
Unrelated to merge.
4 Likes
I think campaigns would have worked in a non F2P game where the incentives are around polishing good content before making questionable content. Gajin’s F2P model just wasn’t equipped for that because they need to be constantly adding new things so people spend money on the game.
A good example of this in theory is HLL where, if you consider each map is about the size of the full maps enlisted plays on, they essentially have this map system. The issue there is that HLL is willing to give every new player on an American team Garands that 1 shot, any player almost every gun from the start, where any unlock is just a new loadout with maybe a couple abilities, like for the engineers.
Enlisted just doesn’t have that ability to sit down and polish the game as much. HLL releases 1 map and gets a wave of new players. Enlisted needs to fight to get old players to buy stuff and new players, who might buy stuff, to join.
2 Likes
i’ll start by saying that, i used to love the merge, but i have become indifferent about it.
it has it’s good and down sides. but as far as it goes, even though i try to stay the most objective possible, the merge was good and needed.
mostly because we had the following issues with campaing systems:
-
lacks of players in one faction campaign resulting in teams of humans vs half of humans and majority of bots
-
grinding the same stuff across multiple campaigns ( which was taking it’s toll and consequentially: )
-
inability to add new content in a reasonable way ( resulting in for example, level 40+ just for a halftrack or new mid gun )
-
reducing quques times
-
preventing new players with level 5 of equipement competing against other players having 30 level+ worth of equipment. creating unbalances and dissatisfaction for newer players.
with that being said, your points feels more like a rant than a logical thought out constructive criticsm.
those are subjective gripes.
and not really inherent to the greater good of the game of in it self.
you can still use them
being uptiered isn’t that bad ( outside the unstable 3 br )
except, the benefits of the merge outclass both the cons of campaign system, and pros.
that happened before, complains were made, nothing happened.
it would make sense in enlisted.
but i presume this one would be an attempt to beat the dead horse of historical accuracy in enlisted.
spoiler allert, it never existed
i was, and have been the first advocate for halftracks.
they might not be ideal for 60% of the playerbase that can put one with one together,
but you don’t need bigger maps to use an halftrack.
as… i would like you to remind that we had bikes and rocket artilleries for realtively small maps.
it goes saying, everything has it’s uses and is a valid option for those who likes them and knows how to use them.
which the new halftrack for how much… uninspiring and repetitvie as many other titles are, it does it’s job and allows to have two active rallies at a time.
which is, and was super helpful.
that is more than anything, a paradox.
which was caused i believe because the campaigns were separated. and now, people can grind what they want without relatives restrictions.
( that one restriction being, you need to unlock many things before you will be able to use the one you want. which can be tiring and somewhat detrimental )
all to say, we are sorry you don’t like the new enlisted, but both for it’s growth, and playerbase, was necessary.
even though, wasn’t and still isn’t perfect.
but just like anything will be and can be adjusted accordingly with time
( even if i’m of the opinion that rushing this update was a bad idea too )
with that being said, we’re kinda late to turn around.
5 Likes
Yea they saying buy to a guy that paid money on this game lol.
Lol tanks u can dress like animals. Panda tanks lol
Scarecrow from wizaes of oz lol
R u pc or playstation. Gees the low iq here.
What is yo
What was your game name?
Im retired army. Play playstation. Turn of crossplay
1 Like
My account aint fake ans my game name the same. I feel bad for you. Please wear a helmet in public.
1 Like
Is tiger 2 a low tier gold tank? My lord you people make a whirewind of patrick star
Now thats an honest answer and opinion with thought. I be happy to have you added on friends list.
1 Like
Tell me you didn’t start playing December 10 only…
2 Likes
I have everything unlocked. Played 2 years now.
Ok.
A friendly advice: edit your posts instead of creating multiple new ones to answer everyone… Mods don’t like it and might suspend you for spam…
2 Likes