This is the case across campaigns across all factions
This don’t make sense, becouse looking at the curent game design you should compare FIGHTERS from the respective level on the campaign tree, both P-47 and FW190 figure on the same place and as the same type.
Futhermore, one is much better than other.
Well good job for this poor guy in his tiny electric car, that has to face Big Guy with Big Tonk…
I had a game when i destroyed 18 of them in this “Tank that’s possible to be destroyed”, wtf xD, you sure it is possible? Damn ye it’s and it’s shouldn’t, poor Allied team.
well, then there is no need to use certain vehicle to counter another certain vehicle. (as the guy I mentioned was saying)
if the lowest tier tank can oneshoot a tier 4 tank, (highest tier) where is the problem?
Yes 100 % agree with you.
So in the case of the FIGHTER fw190 and the ATTACKER P47 they dont get compared and you need to find something else they have in common. Like being the 2nd stongest attacker in their faction.
It is not symetrical. So the germans got a fighter to compensate for a lack of a fighter 2 and US got an attacker 2 because they only had 1 of that. So try to understand the game design before telling me I dont make sense when I talk exactly the way the game is designed.
So again if the devs gave us a tank and a pistol for the same level we wont compare them I dont understand why we need to do that in the game if they both have wings but still dont sit in the same slot.
We are comparing smg with smg, mg with mg, rifle with rifle, tank with tank etc. But no for planes all of the sudden fuck the rules lets compare 2 different slots and when they dont agree tell them its not logical.
1 Like
100% agree For example in moscow sov obtain the Winchester 1895 at the same level the ger obtain prewar kar98K (snip) how you compare a bolt-action/shotgun with a sniper rifle?
The Winchester 1895 is a lever action rifle, it even says as much.
And it is acquired at the same level as ZB-26 lmg.
The Prewar K98 Sniper is the same level as the SVT-38 Sniper.
For normany specifically however, the FG-42 is the best infantry weapon in the game, it is basically an mg34 with a smaller magazine as a weapon any infantry can use.
Which when the game is 0-3 tanks and 0-2 planes and 5-12 infantry squads per side then that infantry weapon is going to make a much bigger difference then the tanks.
1 Like
he said jadgpanzer which he means the jadgpanzer 4 which is confirmed for normandy
yeah, @9889484 my bad.
terribly sorry, i saw in the past as well people making confusion about jagdpanthers and panthers just because those were presents ( back at the time when those tanks were availabe in the pratice ).
but i made a mistake and missreaded.
the jagdpanzer 4 L/48 which it’s going to be introduced ( not sure though, it was announced 1 year and 5 months ago here “Invasion of Normandy”: armoured vehicles - News - Enlisted, but we got other tanks instead ).
and i thought you were talking about the jagdpanther:
( which many people in the past for some reasons thinks it’s a panther: )
( i guess they confuse for the name )
( which is somewhat what i did above but i thought he was talking about the other tank)
nontheless, thanks for the correction.
3 Likes
no problem, it’s only human to make mistakes
1 Like
I think which plane is better is quite subjective, depending on how you use it.
BF109 has better maneuver, P38 has rockets
Ju188 has more payload, A20 has some sort of self-defense
BF110 has 37mm and 30mm, P47 has 500lb and better maneuver