Map selection system is a scam, everyone knows it.
I am leaving currently every second match because it either contains a map that I dont want to play, or a gamemode I dont like.
Let us choose what we want to play.
Add real bans.
Its not that complicated.
8 Likes
I have long suggested at least disabling penalties and lowering the rating if a player leaves a map that is on their list of unwanted ones. That way, this system will at least make some sense.
The current system could be interesting but half the time I get the one map in a pool of like ten that I downvoted and I’m sitting there suffering through Quarry.
1 Like
I agree and that btw the most banned maps should get a revision and get more importance when it comes to improve em
Thats how we can provide more inderect feedback to devs
There’s no need to ban maps; simply reclassify them.
Reclassify? What do you mean?
yeah that or ban mode cause I really hate assault. It the one mode my “dont care attitude” dont work cause it need team work.
And if anyone know about the join any team luck sometime it doesnt work out so well
1 Like
In my opinion 80% of matches should be invasion - confrontation and conquest mixed in here and there for some diversity.
Assault is just invasion* - but the defender can capture back ( obviously biased for the attackers)
And demolition needs a rework, AI doesn’t defuse or plant or defend the objective to begin with.
Assault is just invasion in favor of the defenders and demolition is just invasion in favor of the attackers, they could both use some reworks
1 Like
Forwarded, thanks for suggesting
5 Likes