The event is good but can you change the BR on Ki-43-II to BR I please.
So as you can see the plane is not exactly a BR II plane literally its BR I plane. I don’t know why the allies can get absolutely insane planes in BR II and BR III and when you give Japan some cool plane you put it on a higher BR here a list of BR I planes :
As you can clearly see its a BR I plane.
Since lets compare it with the Zero :
As you can see the Zero has cannons and a lot of ammo and its better plane so how the Ki-43-II is a BR II plane ?
Or we can compare it with P-38
As you can see if you go in a frontal engagement against it with a good BR II boom and zoom aircraft you are dead since this thing has 4 heavy machine guns and cannon. So if Ki-43 is BR II plane what planes should be BR I planes for Japan planes without MGs ? A fighter plane just with 2 heavy machine guns and no cannons and limited ammo wont be good BR II plane it belongs in BR I with the rest of similar planes and not to mention Japan already has terrible tanks at BR I and Japan air force is the main selling point for the faction if we put Ki-43-II in BR I still wont be the best BR I plane and Japan has absolutely abysmal BR I fighter so will be huge improvement for BR I while for BR II will be just a worse Zero option and god forbids you need to use Ki-43-II vs BR III ground attackers.
As you can see the XA-38 has the same firepower on its back with more ammo then you so good luck against it xD But there is more simply the XA-38 is like the worst scenario you can have with Ki-43 since there is nothing you can do against it. But against every plane with machine gun in the back you will have problems since Ki-43-II has bad firepower with limited ammo and the bombers ohh boy you better don’t move near them to the Soviet or Allies bombers with Ki-43 since they will literally massacre you so better ignore the bomber calls with this plane.
- Yes for the love of god move Ki-43-II it to BR I
- No Ki-43-II is for sure BR II plane since for what reason ??? Please put a comment why if you vote no.
I will play it even in BR II since there is no options for Japan however the plane is a BR I material since in Enlisted 2 heavy machine guns vs a lot of planes that have huge HP can ruin your day (US and USSR ground attackers ) and even some attackers with MG at the back can do serious damage to a plane that has just 2 heavy machineguns. The event is cool but the plane is not BR II material. Show me one other fighter plane that is BR II and has just 2 heavy machine guns…even an FP-3 that is absolute trash has 4 heavy machine guns and like 1800 rounds the only plane so bad would be BF-109 F-2 and the Ki-43-II has even less fire power then the F-2.
2 Likes
The stat blocks of other planes made the choice easy
1 Like
I have even more insane BR I plane but im tired of posting the Italian one xD
3 Likes
Maybe only if they change u.s. hurricane to have 2 u.s. bombs and get rid of the pitch-up when diving. The ki has a way better payload compared to u.s. fighters in br1 and br2. It’s flying characteristics are also waaaayyyy better than any other br2 plane.
The ki is way better than the bi planes so not sure why you put them in there.
How exactly its better then the soviet ones ?
1 Like
Because it has double the payload and 12.7 is way bigger than 7. If it can fit more ammo though it should. This is a good br2 plane. The yak1 and bf109 are just stupidly good br1 planes. Realistically the e7 should be br2 and the f1/2 should be br1
And how many MGs they have ? Go on ? Same number?
2 Likes
The 153 has top speed of 428khm a whole 100 less than the ki. The Biplanes are god awful slow going to resupply and it takes forever. The rockets aren’t that good for infantry either, I much prefer two 100kg bombs for tanks and infantry. It’s also easier to reliably hit a tank with a bomb.
The i16 flys so effing terrible. I haven’t tested it out since the 30% fuel became a thing, but it would spin and wobble all over the damn place trying to turn. Almost impossible to keep on target when engaging an enemy.
All we see you are super bias person lets do a bit of math then :
So this is OK but this is not ?
All you do is keep showing same bias. So how your argument is valid ?
3 Likes
P38 is an attacker.
M8 rockets has been nerfed into oblivion. If they retained their destructive force I’d say the ki is br1 for sure.
Either way, in comparison to u.s. planes it has double the payload size, which is huge because they all either get two 100lb, two suck ass british bombs, or one 250lb (premmy shouldn’t count to be compared with). If the p51 got two 250s, I’d also say sure, the ki can be br1. A 4+ second turn time is huge.
Stop digging your own grave its the best attacker but fine is it an attacker ?
Keep playing stupid allies bias games keep winning stupid prizes.
Not only you are having the best attacker plane in BR II but you are having the best fighter lets compare it to your event plane:
4 Likes
Your anti u.s. bias is strong cause this most definitely goes to the su2 for russia.
What br2 attacker could be so good that the u.s. has? You better not say the p38 cause it’s rockets are horrid now.
It also has a 6 SECOND TURN TIME difference. That’s far more than the meteor and 262 which germans can’t seem to keep complaining about.
Sure IL-2 is worse then P-38G-1 stop lying really…
1 Like
I said SU2, not il2. The SU2 is the best br2 attacker in game. And guees what it only gets two 7mm frontal machine guns but yet with it’s massive payload and great turn time it dominates. The two 7mms are enough to take out other planes as well
Since you gonna go that road how you gonna play with Ki-43 against SU2 and no SU2 is not the best its P-38. But all this is absolute irrelevant since even this ground attackers are better then Ki-43 II… and you can have 2x P-38 and and you can have IL-2 and SU2 and all this attackers can absolutely devastate Ki-43-II…no need even for a fighter plane.So its really time to stop since you are not making it look good for the allies or the soviets;
2 Likes
Listen, what if we ask to change its belts and payload to more competent ones
2 Likes
The payload. I would absolutely take a u.s. plane with 2 50 cals and a good br2 payload (bombs) over a mediocre plane with mediocre guns and a shit payload
It wont save it since in Enlisted planes have more HP then war thunder.
I mean what you gonna do in a map with a carrier you will never catch it.
If the payload is the problem they can reduce it. 2x50 kg bombs and be BR I.
That would be fine, but i would actually prefer the two 100kgs for my br2 line up
I’ve already said the zero should be br1. I care a bit more about the bombs and flying characteristics than i do about guns
Yeah but in BR II you will have huge problems against a lot of aircrafts and god forbids you must fight some BR III aircrafts with 500 rounds on the Ki since they are barely enough for one fight depends on the plane you are fighting. Some US fighters have less HP if they are stupid to dog fight you maybe but against the soviet BR III attackers even the IL with the MG on the back will ruin your fun very fast.
3 Likes
