陸戦隊空挺部隊の補給箱から11式LMGを取り出します。 同盟国は補給箱から BAR (BR 3) を入手できるのに、なぜ日本の空挺部隊が 11 型を入手する必要があるのでしょうか。 彼らはタイプ 11 lmg irl を決して使用しませんでした。
日本の空挺部隊には 96 式銃と 99 式銃が支給されました。
Remove Type 11 lmg from Rikusentai paratrooper’s supply box. Allies get the BAR(BR 3)from their supply box so why should Japan’s paratrooper get type 11! They never used Type 11 lmg irl.
Japan’s paratrooper were issued Type 96 and 99 lmgs.
You probably got the game wrong, this game is not historically accurate. I am fighting the Italians in Moscow. The Type 11 is a better machine gun than the BAR. And this topic was already here a few hours ago.
I will suggest looking at the datamine sheet before saying type 11 lmg better then BAR again. Your inexperiences does not hold any value on a weapons performance.I am very aware HA removed from enlisted but if that’s truly been the case a lot of other equipments would already be in game and in factions where they aren’t atm. But this isn’t just about HA it’s also to fair balance and sensible to the BR.
I have almost 30,000 machine gun kills. BAR is my most played machine gun. I also played with Type 11. I don’t need to look at stupid stats to know that Type 11 is better.
Pathetic
Add another 200000 on it still not close to mine.
Only 30k LMG kills lmao
At least the Japanese have a Japanese arsenal, I just want my British paratroopers to actually have British gear in their box
the type 96 might bet too good for BR II matches maybe the current type 99?
I have never wanted the game to be 200% historically accurate. For example I have no problem with prototype things whatsoever. Everyone just draws their line and standards differently. Italy invaded the SU in 1941 so in my book it’s fine if they are present in Moscow 1941.
My gripe is more when you have something time traveling back like Volkssturm weapons in 1941-42, or when you can’t use an early war gun like the AVS in early war battles. Pretty much my standard is just the year it was made is the year it should appear.