Ok, I don’t know if anyone has noticed, but all of the campaigns that we’ve played have the same Axis country, Germany. We need to get more Asian recognition here. I did hear Iwo Jima is “Confirmed” after Tunisia, but just having one Japanese campaign is not enough. The devs could add Battle of Hong Kong with Uk and Chinese soldiers or maybe Battle of Shanghai because we’re looking at big and well-known battles.
1 Like
Iwo Jima I’m very interested in (I love the Japanese faction, I do silly kamikaze moves in games with them)
But I’d be much, MUCH more interested in Stalingrad and the Finnish/Soviet winter war before things like Shanghai and Hong Kong battles 
5 Likes
What’s the fun of the Winter War? It’s pretty embarrassing war lol for us Russians. So we might not see that one here. And I don’t think there is that much scenery to cover. Just snow fields? We already have that, in Moscow.
Good to hear Iwo Jima is next.
Are you telling me… that Russian bias is a real thing from gaijin? That Russian players would only like battlefields where they looked good? Gasp! My goodness! Who would have known?!? 
give time to the dev the tunisia campaign is not even out
2 Likes
When they make pacific campaign
They need to correctly make the troops Japanese
Not how they gave an allies
asian look
make it smaller with smaller hitboxes mheuheuheh
also, this. be patient people
also, this. be patient people
I would like to have “Banzai~~” when JP troops charging 
, oh, also if we have “Whoa~~~~~” when rus charging would be nice.
I mean, game is still in open beta. Sure they will add more maps, countries and weapons. Be patient. And also i’m waiting for Navy thing for all countries.
dude, uncool
that would be a bit dumb and a bit offeneding ngl but eh who’s stopin ya
To be honesty, some weapons will be unbalanced in pacific campaigns…
In case of battle of Iwojima, US side have lots of Garland semi-auto rifle but Japanese didn’t have it. Although experimental prototypes and copy of Garland (Navy’s Type 4 rifle) were existing in mainland, but not in frontline well… (some of them are captured in Okinawa)
Also, problem of anti-tank weapon and tanks are quite serious. For example, Type 97 medium tank’s 47 mm gun can’t penetrate front armor of M4 tank - and it was the latest medium tank in frontline and there’s no alternative. Some SPGs with decent 75mm or 150mm gun were sent to frontline but they are deployed to land of decisive battle, Philippine. And others are stayed in mainland of Japan for the last battle.
Additionally, Japanese best anti-tank cannon, Type 1 47 mm QF gun can’t penetrate front armor of American tanks but almost all American cannons can destroy Japanese tanks from any side & range. Especially some light vehicles’ armor will be penetrated by 12.7 mm M2HB machine gun.
In currently game system, I think it will be difficult to implement campaigns of Japanese vs US forces.
2 Likes
Why it went so bad? What have we done wrong?
1 Like
honestly this is where they should’ve introduced the US into the game.
The Philippines campaign of 1941-42… would’ve allowed them to balance the US with bolt-actions only as the marines didn’t yet have the M1 Garand in any substantial number…
D-Day this early in a game lacks the build up necessary…