That’s on you. the double barrels combined with controllable rof made an excellent weapon for an aggressive player… now it’s only usable when mounted or laying down… which the higher rof with better accuracy is more suited to that role… however it was perfect as cqc weapon… god forbid an mg suit that role.
I use the hodgkiss. It’s every bit as good as a BAR in br2.
but even so, the smgs more than make up for a better BR2 MG.
The tokyo arsenal is a terrific gun with it’s recoil buffs while back. This thing can absolutely carry a high tier match. Haven’t used the new AR, but i absolutely love the 30 cal thompson and solely use it in br3 and br4. I’m assuming they are very similar.
Chi-nu ii is fantastic in br3, ho-i is fantastic in br 2, yes br1 TT tanks suck.
Ki-100 is every bit as good as a br5 prop plane, absolutely insane for br3, zero varient is a really good plane for br2 although it’s bomb load is a little lacking, would rather one 100kg bomb and two 60kgs. And again, br 1 planes are no good.
So again, i will state, just because they are missing some things here and there, they are still very competitive over all.
Sure, what doesn’t work for me may work for you.
Both weapons you cited will be BR 4 with the major update