you said “bots”
It’d undoubtedly be one of the best balancing decisions the game could possibly make. As much as I enjoy the challenge of running a BR4 line-up against BR5, the gap in equipment is beyond comparison and the disparity is absurd.
1 Like
The wood mock-up model from early prototyping isn’t a 2017 fabrication, recordings from 1961 as shown here a proof of that.
What’s made up is armour values.
1 Like
The Ho-Ri we have in the game is a 2017 fabrication. It never existed even as a planned vehicle.
Even War Thunder admitted that
Yes and no, in terms of final gun housing and shape the wooden mock-up wasn’t accurate to the then later proposed configurations. But it’s not made up either, simply inaccurate. A more accurate realised design would be this iteration. Which is quite similar in configuration to the current one in game, but still different.
But as has been shown over time, the final proposed and then in progress built models are the ones with the 20mm AA guns on the back and the 37mm in the front like the Chi Ri.
And don’t get me wrong, I’m all in favour of the more accurate final proposal come to the game. I’m just stating that the current Ho-Ri isn’t a 2017 fabrication, the front slopped hull and just the 10cm gun was the absolute earliest version.
1 Like
But it is made up.
The only two Hori variants ever considered for production were these:
The giant angled frontal plate version we have ingame was never even planned.
Well that’s not accurate, the sloped hull just didn’t go further than the wood mock-up and the Ho-Ri 1 (sloped) sketch as I had provided, in favour of maintaining the 37mm gun of the Chi-Ri chassis as resource shortages and production strain very likely would have made it unviable to significantly alter the armour, we then later transitioned to the Ho-Ri 2 with the engine configuration in the back.
1 Like
But yes, the current “production” & “prototype” label we have are false and inaccurate, the biggest problem with the Ho-Ri is that it’s an amalgam of half truths to create something which isn’t real. There’s aspects that are accurate and others that aren’t, the sloped hull itself did exist at some point in planning, but the casemate of the tank is inaccurate just as it’s loading assist isn’t accurate either, the dimensions are all over the place.
I’m not arguing the current Ho-Ri existed, just that the sloped hull at one point in development did.
1 Like
I posted a similar suggestion on the Ru-forum:
1 Like
I feel targeted by this lol
1 Like
What I was saying is that I couldn’t care less if the games are less populated and prefer bots over BRIV players in by BRV games… pardon the confusion.
You’re well within your rights to enjoy a certain tier but when some use it as a reason to hate on BRV stuff that’s when I start to get confused.
So imagine I was BR2 player and just cried whenever people wanted stuff for BR3… pretty pathetic right?
I personally enjoy br4, it’s just it needs to be in a queue apart from br5 due to its gap in power. And this isn’t me hating on br5(as I love using br5 presets too), it’s just me expressing my opinion. That’s why I never really call for nerfs on br5 weapons at all.
1 Like
same
By a long shot. The grind is way better too. At first the rp cost goes up super fast but after the end of tier 3 it goes up much less 100,000 to 130,000. Makes it actually doable to get to top tier without giving an arm and a leg. War thunder would be closer to 100,000 to 500,000.
No its not
Garand is not as good as g43 Zh29
30 round thomp not 40 round thomp i mean kiraly39m
Jumbo to panther no
Bar not equal 75 round mg
is br3 closer to br4 then br4 to 5 yes
are they equal no, and hell no
Yeah, surely this is worse than the G43 versus AVS-36 20 right?
Well how about 30 cal Thompson versus Kiraly 39M then?
How about Jumbo 75mm versus Tiger 2 (H)? Would you prefer that?
BR 3 already got some 75 rnds LMG. Plus, Johnson LMG versus Type 100 LMG. Or how about 200 rnds Stinger versus 50 rnds MG42?
Nobody said that they are literally the 100% equal. Are you making stuff up now?
3 Likes
closer, no closer
the issue is now br3 gets to face br4 and br2
in that world br4 only can face br3
who is goin to use br3 if it has ups and downs
but br4 only has ups
so yes br4 vs br5 sucks
almsot as much as it would suck for br3 by just breaking off br5
And? BR 5 only faces BR 4 right now, with even greater power gap than the BR 4 vs BR 3. What are you saying?
A lot of people will actually. BR 3 has constantly been the most popular BR because it has the comparable equipment to even BR 4 and gets to stomp BR 2 very often. It’s interesting to see that you think the BR 4 being “the new BR 5” would completely kill BR 3. It would definitely not.
Yeah, not really. They are obviously not the same and if you really think that BR 3 vs BR 4 is as much worse as BR 4 vs BR 5 then you need to start looking at the reality instead of coping.
1 Like
people play br3 becasue people who play br4 have to fight br5
is br4 only had to fight br4 and br3 then everytone would play br4 there would be no down side to playing br4 at all
people play br3 because br4 has ups and downs you remove br5 and and it is all ups
besides br5 and br1 anyone who can punch down has to punch up
the current br lineup is balanced with br5 just being miserable for everyone
if br4 cant fight br5 is cant fight br3
so either
br 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5
or
br 1-2 2-3 4 5
you go to hell if
br 1-2 2-3 3-4 5
And? BR 5 only faces BR 4 right now, with even greater power gap than the BR 4 vs BR 3. What are you saying?
its not zero youre asking for br4 to be allowed to punch down while being itself protected. no protected br4 from 5 and 3 from 4
if br3 can face br 2 3
then br4 can face br4 and br4 and b4
either br 4 can face 3 and 5 or just 4