Today I played invasion - Maisky Forestry South, we were attacking and we lost on the last point because of lack of the reinforcents.
But - I noticed something funny in the final score. A guy with the 123 kills + 7 destroyed tanks has lost 31 (!!!) own squads.
One squad = between 4 or 6 people, so this guy had lost more man than he killed enemies.
But this guy had second place in the ranking…
I mean - OK. This is invasion, we have to attack, but - what is more efficient - an attack with 90 kills / 10 squads lost or an attack with 100 kills / 20 squads lost ?
Would it not be better to just display enemies killed / own man lost (instead of the squads) and then for example multiply the score by the kills / death ratio ?
Player still has +100 points for capturing the zone so is encoureged to capture the zone instead of camping.
