Meanwhile, Italian AB41s storming Moscow.
Disadvantages: Do not overestimate ：the execution, action, and effectiveness of the work of programmers and numerical planning, comprehensive logic, rigorous and meticulous, complete and perfect supporting system.
Pros: Do not underestimate the number of new bugs, do not underestimate the number of resurrected old bugs。
even the df production of the cake embryo is still a batter, Do not underestimate they has begun to sculpt a sea of various cream or chocolate material decoration
I agree and agree with the idea of merging lines and other updates, but this business case is almost 4 months old news, and this week may only be announced new technology tree or new br.
According to your chosen equipment you will get into matching timeline of campaigns. But if not enough ppl with the same equipment you may fight players with higher or lower equipment.
-if you pick early war equipment you will fight others with this type (mostly beginners) but you will fight better equipped players too.
-if you pick the best weapons from late war you will fight the same people or players with earlier (lower quality) equipment.
I can see the point where everyone is running around with FG42 and noone shoots a damn kar98k anymore. For now if Im a fan of early war equipment I can play the Moscow campaign (with stgs all around tough) but later Im afraid the game wont be historical anymore and we will rarely play the maps of early war.
i have seen and talked with tons of people who like prewar/early war stuff. besides, sealclubbing will be a thing for low br
This is why I have said that the BR system needs to be reconsidered like the way this system is thought of is based on vehicles but small arms didn’t matter much in many situations like a bolt action rifle can do much on ranges where in some cases even better than self loading rifles as there’s no 100mms thick armor on the hull thing for infantry.
Its just the skill difference where newer players get stomped by more experienced high level players even with the same loadout like both use bolt actions makes the BR system absolute nonsense as it didn’t solve the seal clubbing problem in War Thunder either.
1 Like
When I say strongest BRS (I don’t mean highest), I’m talking about a BR which will be (or seem) inherently stronger for a certain side. (T-50 will most likely be a good example or early t-34. Really depends on how bigger BR spread they define)
VETS will clean up at whatever BR, But the rest will gravitate to where the strongest line up is (sweet spot)
warthunder 4.0 Is hugely popular for KV-1 and t-34 dominance. 5.3 is hugely Popular for tiger and panther dominance.
Actually what about a level system for the players? (like a level 1 player (beginner) to level 100 player)
Players up to level 10 would be in games together, then when they passed level 10, they would be thrown into the games with the vets.
I think this is better than the BR system as a level 1 player with a bolt action can still face a level 100 with a bolt action as the latter brings only bolt actions + fully upgraded too.
1 Like
Nonsense.
I wouldn’t be able to play with friend. He’s beginner and we play together like 1/2 per month. And that’s the only time when he’s playing this game.
It’s not problem that new players will face vets. This isn’t competitive game.
Skill/level MM would completely kill off this game.
3 Likes
Good point, this is a big concern for me as well. Hopefully, since uniforms are still tied to maps, USMC will remain in the pacific.
Yeah, but for example you’ll most probably see Thompson USMC in Tunisia. Not camos tho I guess.
2 Likes
It was a thing back in 2021 but not anymore with various mechanics introduced that made the game basically competitive because it forced players to play competitively.
Nah, there’s still more casuals than people who actually cares about winning. Otherwise everyone would be building rally points.
1 Like
I agree with you 100%. Some days I feel like Tunisia type gameplay, sometimes Normandy, sometimes Berlin. Removing our ability to choose that much is really a bite in the ass of the players.
4 Likes
I agree too. It sucks, but it’s understandable.
1 Like
Personally I’m fine with a merge as it has huge potential for new gear but I really dislike the BR MM. Imo it will not work in at least 25% of cases and will kill diversity in equipment (not like we have much nowdays).
We will see how it turns out.
4 Likes
iirc somewhere they said they will think about map selection after the merge.
but if you want arguments for merge, simply you just need to see that overall 40% of players entering the match are bots (30% for crossplay on). depending on time of day/campaign/server you can get match with 80% bots. if merge can fix big part of that problem i count it as a win.
It depends on many BR levels are planned. I would love to see something like 3 levels only, I think it wouldn’t problem in this case.
But I kinda know it’s unrealistic. But I really hope there is no more than 5 levels planned.
1 Like
Imo it will be 10. WT and WoT go for 10 (ish) so I suspect we will follow.
Though it’s guessing at this point.
1 Like
Yeah, but in WT WW2 stuff are mostly on 1 - 5 BR, not counting some German 6/7 br tanks
3 Likes